🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <MERRITT.93Jan12180017@macro.bu.edu> merritt@macro.bu.edu (Sean Merritt) writes:
>In article <1993Jan12.203251.18849@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
>
>#	First, if a 'channel' becomes noisy, then someone is not 
>#	doing their job properly, and I hope someone would point that out.
>
>Since there is no definitive defintion this(the "job") is left to the reader.
>
>"One man's noise is another's signal"

     The whole point of the group is to *not* leave the 'job' to the 
     reader.  I don't know about you, but collectively we have generated
     nearly half a meg (including thousands of prospective moderator's words)
     delineating the 'job' as we now see it.  I had nearly
     a thousand lines of correspondence with you personally (just before 
     Matt posted the charter) in an attempt to assuage fears and present
     a coherent philosophy.  If it is not at least generally understood 
     by now, I know no way to do so.

     As far as the quotation goes, I hope all the moderators agree
     on what constitutes noise and what constitutes signal.  As far as
     humanly possible, I think we do.

                           dale bass
-- 
C. R. Bass                                          crb7q@virginia.edu        
Department of Mechanical, 
     Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia                              (804) 924-7926