Article View: sci.physics
Article #7269Re: How moderation would work
From: John C. Baez
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 01:54
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 01:54
9 lines
952 bytes
952 bytes
In article <m720wB1w165w@1776.COM> bob@1776.COM (Robert Coe) writes: >There's been a lot said recently to the effect that the panel of moderators >would (or should) vote on whether to accept a particular article. Surely >that would be too cumbersome and slow! Indeed, I would never consent to moderate if I had to look at all articles. For one, I have other things to do. For two, I go on vacations now and then. I expect to discuss only the most problematic cases with other moderators, at least once things get going.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan13.015437.22144@galois.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaezReferences:
<m720wB1w165w@1776.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) Subject: Re: How moderation would work Message-ID: <1993Jan13.015437.22144@galois.mit.edu> Sender: news@galois.mit.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA References: <m720wB1w165w@1776.COM> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 01:54:37 GMT Lines: 9