🚀 go-pugleaf

qqq wrote:
> Bluuuue Rajah wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>> news:huuis4h0oov9du17giqmhlm0lbhdu7sv1c@4ax.com: 
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:47:51 GMT, Bluuuue Rajah <Bluuuuue@Rajah.>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "walter" <walter@none.invalid> wrote in
>>>> news:gq88tu$d23$1@news.motzarella.org: 
>>>>
>>>>> Unknown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Talk about 'computer experts' not being very bright-----Do you
>>>>>> think combating a worm with another worm is bright?
>>>>> Actually it's not a bad idea if you read ALL of what was written. 
>>>>> OP seems to be suggesting releasing a (harmless) worm that's sole
>>>>> intent is to target and destroy a nasty one.  If it finds it, it
>>>>> kills it, then kills itself. If it doesn't find it, it just kills
>>>>> itself.  So where's the problem? 
>>>> It's illegal?
>>> Not necessarily.  Depending on its specific function and abilities the
>>> law can be easily bent to allow such a form, especially if it were
>>> setup to where it creates an icon say in your taskbar, which would
>>> allow for instant removal should you click on it and press "OK" with a
>>> dialogue box explaining what it is and what it's doing.  At that point
>>> you're still giving people an option to not have it on their system
>>> and as such can't technically be called a worm/virus.
>> You watch too much tv.
> 
> How much TV do you have to watch to concluded that you saw too much?
> What is too much? I've heard this fable since the 60's and to be frank
> with you, I never saw someone who watched too much. What would it mean,
> I saw too much, do you die, or do you just get tired? Wouldn't the human
> body would regulate itself by falling asleep or so?
> 
> Q
> 
You end up becoming like Jim Carrey's character in "The Cable Guy"