Article View: sci.physics
Article #7361Size of the Universe
From: Randal Nelson
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1986 17:57
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1986 17:57
21 lines
1407 bytes
1407 bytes
From one of Ethan Vishniac's postings: > The flatness problem makes everyone uncomfortable... The mention of hyperspherical models made me wonder how we know that the universe really is as extensive as the distance computed from highly red-shifted objects suggests. In particular, how do we know that the univers is not (relatively) small with a topology that permits closed geodesics. In this case, highly red-shifted light has just looped the loop a couple of times, which would allow the entire universe to be in communication. This would have interesting consequences. For instance, certain object would represent earlier stages of our own galaxy if we knew where to look. I have never heard this notion discussed. Does anyone know what (if anything) eliminates such a model?? Please reply to the net. Randal Nelson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1733@cvl.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!elsie!cvl!nelsonReferences:
<5845@decwrl.DEC.COM> <1322@utastro.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!elsie!cvl!nelson From: nelson@cvl.UUCP (Randal Nelson) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Size of the Universe Message-ID: <1733@cvl.UUCP> Date: Tue, 14-Oct-86 13:57:17 EDT Article-I.D.: cvl.1733 Posted: Tue Oct 14 13:57:17 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 08:15:31 EDT References: <5845@decwrl.DEC.COM> <1322@utastro.UUCP> Organization: Center for Automation Research, Univ. of Md. Lines: 21 Summary: Could the universe be smaller than we think it is?