Superconducting motors

Article View: sci.physics

Article #7593

#7593

From: Jim Kendall
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1987 15:33

9 lines
909 bytes

Thank you all for the response on the motor question. I certainly don't
want to re-fuel the "Meissner Effect" discussion (being new on the net
does have it's disadvantages). Anyway, enough e-mail on the subject (and
egg on my face for overlooking the obvious - |-| ).

Jim Kendall
ISC Systems Corp.
E. 22425 Appleway
Liberty Lake, WA 99019

Technical Details

Message-ID: <585@iscuva.ISCS.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!iscuva!jimk

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!iscuva!jimk
From: jimk@iscuva.ISCS.COM (Jim Kendall)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.research,sci.misc
Subject: Superconducting motors
Message-ID: <585@iscuva.ISCS.COM>
Date: Wed, 29-Jul-87 11:33:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: iscuva.585
Posted: Wed Jul 29 11:33:34 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 31-Jul-87 03:34:42 EDT
Reply-To: jimk@iscuva.UUCP (Jim Kendall)
Distribution: world
Organization: ISC Systems Corporation, Spokane, WA
Lines: 9
Keywords: Enough e-mail
Summary: Thankyou