Article View: sci.physics
Article #7661Is it time for sci.physics.only?
From: Andy Freeman
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1988 06:47
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1988 06:47
17 lines
1204 bytes
1204 bytes
In article <134@laffu.UUCP> chuck@laffu.UUCP (Chuck Sites) writes:
>NO. The consiquneces of the technology we develope will always have
>political overtones which should be debated and are being debated
>(All thanks to you)
Fine, most people seem to feel that sci.physics should carry physics
politics as well as physics.
Is there interest in sci.physics.only "for the rest of us"?
Yes, it's an evil plot. I want a group for physics, not physics
politics. I get my political discussions elsewhere.
-andy
UUCP: {arpa gateways, decwrl, uunet, rutgers}!polya.stanford.edu!andy
ARPA: andy@polya.stanford.edu
(415) 329-1718/723-3088 home/cubicle
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3732@polya.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!polya!cayuga!andyReferences:
<1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!ucsd!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!polya!cayuga!andy From: andy@cayuga.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) Newsgroups: sci.physics,news.admin Subject: Is it time for sci.physics.only? Message-ID: <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> Date: 26 Aug 88 06:47:59 GMT References: <1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP> Sender: news@polya.Stanford.EDU Reply-To: andy@cayuga.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) Organization: Stanford University Lines: 16