Article View: sci.physics
Article #7664Re: Is it time for sci.physics.only?
From: Mike O'Brien
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1988 22:06
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1988 22:06
15 lines
1318 bytes
1318 bytes
In article <641@ncar.ucar.edu> woods@handies.UCAR.EDU (Greg Woods) writes:
>In article <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> andy@cayuga.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) writes:
>>Is there interest in sci.physics.only "for the rest of us"?
>
> Past experience has shown that this DOESN'T WORK. We've tried it a number
>of times, with net.women.only (the failure of which was directly responsible
>for the start of the very successful feminist mailing list)
And there's the right answer. Why don't those who want a more pure
discussion of physics form a mailing list? I don't know of any case
where that solution, once implemented, hasn't worked to perfection.
--
Mike O'Brien
obrien@aerospace.aero.org
{sdcrdcf,trwrb}!aero!obrien
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36701@aero.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sm.unisys.com!aero!obrienReferences:
<1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP> <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> <641@ncar.ucar.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sm.unisys.com!aero!obrien From: obrien@anpiel.aero.org (Mike O'Brien) Newsgroups: sci.physics,news.admin Subject: Re: Is it time for sci.physics.only? Message-ID: <36701@aero.ARPA> Date: 26 Aug 88 22:06:54 GMT References: <1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP> <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> <641@ncar.ucar.edu> Sender: news@aero.ARPA Reply-To: obrien@anpiel.UUCP (Mike O'Brien) Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA Lines: 15