Article View: sci.physics
Article #7666Re: Is it time for sci.physics.only?
From: James HG Redekop
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1988 21:30
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1988 21:30
11 lines
872 bytes
872 bytes
Though I'm quite new to the net, and am not familiar with it to any great
extent, it DOES seem odd to me that of the 5 new messages in sci.physics,
4 of them only mentioned physics, and but one had anything to do with
physics as physics...
Perhaps, if sci.physics.only is not viable, sci.physics.politics would work?
)O+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1988Aug30.173026.4883@ziebmef.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!lsuc!ncrcan!ziebmef!jhgrReferences:
<1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP> <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> <641@ncar.ucar.edu> <36701@aero.ARPA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!lsuc!ncrcan!ziebmef!jhgr From: jhgr@ziebmef.uucp (James HG Redekop) Newsgroups: sci.physics,news.admin Subject: Re: Is it time for sci.physics.only? Message-ID: <1988Aug30.173026.4883@ziebmef.uucp> Date: 30 Aug 88 21:30:23 GMT References: <1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP> <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> <641@ncar.ucar.edu> <36701@aero.ARPA> Reply-To: jhgr@ziebmef.UUCP (James HG Redekop) Organization: Ziebmef Public Access BBS/Unix Lines: 11