Article View: sci.physics
Article #7751Re: Room Temperature fusion - possible indications?
From: Wm. E. Davidsen Jr
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 1989 17:30
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 1989 17:30
52 lines
2915 bytes
2915 bytes
In article <5849@pdn.nm.paradyne.com> alan@rnms1.UUCP (0000-Alan Lovejoy) writes:
| Then we also need either very advanced AI, very advanced biotechnology,
| or artificial gravity: It appears that low gravity fields shut down the
| human immune system in a way similar to the AIDS virus. Humans will NOT
| be spending any appreciable percentage of their lives in space until we
| can fix our immune systems so that they tolerate low gravity, or until
| we can provide gravity artificially. As things stand, a career as an
| asteroid miner would not last long...
What are the parameters on this? I know the Russians had people in
orbit for almost a year (didn't they?) and didn't seem to have problems.
They were visited by other cosmonauts during the time so they weren't in
a sterile atmosphere.
I want to make a hypothesis: we won't go the the belt in any short
time unless we actually get room temperature fusion working. Given that
a fusion powered ship seems a certainty. Can I assume a hydrogen ram
jet? I will guess that the distance is 61 million miles. If you assume
that the constant acceleration is 1 fps^2 I think it takes about 13.1
days for the trip. At 1/10G it would take 7.3 days.
If I didn't drop a deciaml place we are taking about a short journey
here... even assuming 0.1 fps^2 I get 41.5 days. This sounds too good to
be true, and if you extrapolate to 4.5 lightyears it still looks like
space flight is possible.
________________________________________________________________
Since this sounds too good to be true, here's what I did:
1) S = at^2 / 2
2) t = sqrt(2S / a)
if we assume that we accellerate half way and
decellerate half way
3) t = 2 * sqrt(S / a)
S = 65e6 * 5280 (feet)
a sec days
====================
.1 3589317 41.5
0.1 1135041 13.1
3.2 634507 7.3
If I didn't make a silly mistake in the equasions, which seems likely
given the results, or if I have overestimated the power of a fusion
powered hydrogen ram jet, please let me know.
Also if someone has info on such a jet as far as implementation or power
it would help quantify the discussion.
--
bill davidsen (wedu@crd.GE.COM)
{uunet | philabs}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13468@steinmetz.ge.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-lcc!lll-winken!uunet!steinmetz!davidsenReferences:
<290@vlsi.ll.mit.edu> <1098@Portia.Stanford.EDU> <296@v7fs1.UUCP> <5849@pdn.nm.paradyne.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-lcc!lll-winken!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (Wm. E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.research,sci.space Subject: Re: Room Temperature fusion - possible indications? Keywords: fusion deuterium power Message-ID: <13468@steinmetz.ge.com> Date: 28 Mar 89 17:30:30 GMT References: <290@vlsi.ll.mit.edu> <1098@Portia.Stanford.EDU> <296@v7fs1.UUCP> <5849@pdn.nm.paradyne.com> Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) Distribution: sci Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 52