Article View: sci.physics
Article #7829Re: Present "scientific laws" that supposedly rule energy, are like
From: Sylvia Else
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:53
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:53
29 lines
2719 bytes
2719 bytes
janpajak@gmail.com wrote: > On Jul 14, 4:03 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote: > ... >>> I sympathize. Can you prove to us that the 1 in 1 apple corresponds to >>> the mathematical concept of 1 precisely. >> That would be problematic in the absence of a mathematical definition of >> what the 1 in 1 apple means. >> >> >> >>> Or do you just assume that 1 apple + 1 apple = 2 apples without proof? >> Ditto for a definition of the 2 in 2 apples. >> >> Sylvia. > > WOW, the above is an excellent example of how theoretically deduced > laws can differ from the reality. But instead of 1 apple + 1 apple, I > would suggest to use: 1 liter of water + 1 liter of spirit =/ (is NOT > equal to) 2 litres of vodka. With laws that describe energy is exactly > the same. However, the problem is that the majority of present > scientists have no clue about what actually happens in the real world. > This is why we still have the "energy crisis". > > With the totaliztic salute, > Jan Pajak No, sorry, now I cannot even see where you're coming from on this. Sylvia.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<48803de3$0$13943$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<0c863c7e-a3a6-4a0f-baa3-ea581841efc6@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <4879eba4$0$30465$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <NYBek.18674$Mc.8167@read1.cgocable.net> <487aedce$0$1027$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <H8Dek.19357$Mc.18946@read1.cgocable.net> <487b083a$0$13944$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <4f418b4f-d1b8-4148-9320-35f9a2319045@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,337d7a8b25e9e79b X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,337d7a8b25e9e79b X-Google-Thread: 10e415,337d7a8b25e9e79b X-Google-Thread: 108659,337d7a8b25e9e79b X-Google-Thread: 10607c,337d7a8b25e9e79b X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid107e5d,gid10e415,gid108659,gid10607c,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:53:23 +1000 From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,aus.cars,sci.environment Subject: Re: Present "scientific laws" that supposedly rule energy, are like References: <0c863c7e-a3a6-4a0f-baa3-ea581841efc6@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <4879eba4$0$30465$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <NYBek.18674$Mc.8167@read1.cgocable.net> <487aedce$0$1027$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <H8Dek.19357$Mc.18946@read1.cgocable.net> <487b083a$0$13944$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <4f418b4f-d1b8-4148-9320-35f9a2319045@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <4f418b4f-d1b8-4148-9320-35f9a2319045@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 29 Message-ID: <48803de3$0$13943$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.106.220.150 X-Trace: 1216364003 13943 122.106.220.150 X-Original-Bytes: 2281