🚀 go-pugleaf

"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message 
news:cqoea5-m1k.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
| In sci.physics, Dan Bloomquist
| <public21@lakeweb.com>
| wrote
| on Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:34:25 GMT
| <lm%Aj.5821$7d1.4330@news01.roc.ny>:
| > The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
| >> In sci.physics, Dan Bloomquist
| >> <public21@lakeweb.com>
| >>  wrote
| >> on Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:26:55 GMT
| >> <PkqAj.5745$7d1.92@news01.roc.ny>:
| >>> Androcles wrote:
| >>>> "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
| >>>> news:18hAj.5718$7d1.2157@news01.roc.ny...
| >>>>
| >>>> | And the underlying mechanism is understood to
| >>>> | be receding galaxies.
| >>>>
| >>>> Naive nonsense.
| >>> Once a crank, always a crank. How you doing cranky?
| >>>
| >>> You have quite the track record...
| >>>
| >>> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html
| >>
| >> Yes he does, and I think Dirk gave up out of sheer frustration on
| >> cataloging all of them. ;-)
| >>
| >>>> 
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
| >>> Retard. Does it hurt?
| >>
| >> The only thing that appears to pain him is the fact that
| >> SR has been widely accepted in the world of physics...
| >
| >> Regrettably, actual data validating SR is a little hard to
| >> come by, and some experiments are easily misinterpreted --
| >> he routinely touts Sagnac as disproving SR, for example.
| >> (Short answer: it doesn't, really.)
| >
| > I know. I tried to explain the Sagnac effect to him about four years
| > ago. At least, that if c' = c + v there would be no beat frequency. He
| > is adamant about his beliefs.
|
| And has been since about 1999.
|
Sagnac disproves SR because there is a beat. At least if c was the
same is all frames of reference there would be no beat.
Bloomquist has his head up his arse and is adamant in his belief in
Einstein's shit. What he tries to explain he fails at miserably.
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/SagnacIdiocy.htm

the counter-rotating pulse arrives at the "end" point slightly earlier than 
the co-rotating pulse at exactly the same time.

Fucking idiot.