🚀 go-pugleaf

janpajak@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 1, 10:12 pm, Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhund...@elves.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>>> Instead of bleating about this on usenet why not build one, sell the
>>> power to a utility and retire to the Riveria on the income generated
>>> (no pun).   You could live on Moet et Chandon and pate d'fois gras
>>> while laying endless nubile young wenches.  But there's the rub.  You
>>> can't can you?  The practical proof of the theoretical pudding is in
>>> the eating.
> ...
>> He can't build one, because it is patented:http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5313850-claims.html
> ...
> 
> I would NOT scare potential builders of this perpetual motion flywheel
> just by telling them that it was patented. This is because every
> patent has its life span, and also because every patent can be walk
> around by utilising some specific technical details for which it is
> not restricted. Therefore, the existence of this patent only should
> encourage various hobbyists to build this flywheel, as it proves that
> it actually DOES work as a perpetual motion device. The patent also
> proves that all this spitting done by some individuals on the idea
> presented here is actually out of place and unjustified. The flywheeel
> will really work - no matter what some well masked individuals are
> telling us about it.
> 
> I personally cannot build this flywheel for the simple reason that I
> do NOT have conditions for building it. After all, in order to build
> something mechanical, one needs to have space, tools, materials,
> money, time, practical skills, and many other encouraging conditions.
> I do not have any of these. But I have a will and proper conditions to
> encourage others to build it in modern days simply to prove visually
> that are untrue all these loud claims of scientists who stated that a
> perpetual motion device cannot be build. In turn when once we prove
> these claims to be untrue, then many people will have the courage to
> seek other principles of operation that will be more efficient from
> the energy generation point of view. After all, if perpetual motion
> devices can be build at all, then building them can take place on many
> different principles. On my web page "free_energy.htm" I am providing
> such another principle, based on the phenomenon of telekinesis, which
> is this "better" principle for implementing perpetual motion. This is
> because telekinesis allows to form feedback loops of energy, means
> devices which operate on principles of telekinesis allow their output
> energy to be supplied to them as their input energy. This in turn
> multiplies their energy yield.
> 
> With the totaliztic salute,
> Jan Pajak
> 

C'mon Tom, let me whitewash the fence......pleeze

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com