🚀 go-pugleaf

Laurence Godfrey wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:24:48 -0500, "Ray Gordon" <caveman21@nni.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Please answer why you can't just file a John-Doe claim.
>
> They do not exist in England, and I sue in defamation in the English
> High Court.
>
> >Why not just get it from the ISP via a subpoena?  You're the one who claims
> >to be trained in law.
>
> I could. I may still do so. But you miss the point. Someone who
> invites me to sue him and then fails to provide the necessary
> information is the child who taunts: "I dare you to hit me" and
> immediately runs away.
>
> Laurence

Ok Laurence I've hinted, I've spoon-fed, I've cajoled in order to try to get
you to see your Original error. Here it is:
1) You made a baseless charge , and threatened an innocent organization with
legal action, over a forged from line in a message path. This was done either
because you are incompetent when it comes to the finer points of network data
transmission or because you are lazy, I don't know which.

2) When you were shown the error you had made, you admitted that you had
believed the header might not be genuine, but then threatened legal action if
the correspondence was made public.
You have no legal right to send someone a document then threaten them with
legal action if they display it. Once they have it , it's theirs to do with as
they wish. To successfully sue attrition.org you would have to sue all of the
web servers that mirror USENET groups, and anyone who ever quoted the original
post.

3) I could care less about whether or not you have EVER been defamed or if the
original post was defamatory. I care about your handling of it, and your
baseless legal threats. To that end I am calling your bluff.

Brian E. Holbrook
1927 N. 18th Ave. Pasco, WA 99301 USA
29 yrs of age
6' even (you can translate that into meters on your own , can't you?)
165 lbs (translate that into stone yourself , will you?)
Hair : None
Eyes: Blue

(AKA- hobo, but then you should have had that figured out long ago)