🚀 go-pugleaf

On 21 Aug, 11:10, Arthur Brain <arthur_bra...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Theo_Deli...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> > The potentially libellous vandalism was in some of the other material
> > you - or someone using the same IP address as yourself - added to the
> > stub article.  This included, but was not limited to, allegations made
> > against Laurence that had been falsely reported as having been part of
> > the judgement in the first case of Godfrey v. Demon Internet
>
> What a load of crapola.

All anyone has to do is to visit the history page of that article to
see that my comments were both true and accurate.

> I bet you use an apple-mac.

Wrong again.  Care to quit now, while you're only a little behind?

> The Wikipedia article was far too bland, excluding as it did the
> colourful background to the sorry individual's industrious litigation.
>
> I therefore added in a good bunch of interesting quotes.

I thsnk you for having admitted your guilt in this matter.  It should
make it so much easier for Laurence to "sue your sorry ass" (as some
colonials are given to say).

> [If I missed some good ones, why didn't you add them in?]

As it is abundantly obvious that the description of "gentleman" hardly
applies to you, you may perhaps be forgiven for not understanding that
one does not wish to harm or hurt one's friends.

> Insults against Canadians, Germans, Thais, and unidentified
> individuals - "drooling retards" was a good one.
> Doesn't like "retards" much, does he?

He may or he may not.  Readers of your nonsense may soon begin to
dislike you and/or wonder if you might be a "retard".

> I also added a paragraph from Morland's judgment, which outlined the
> defence, to provide balance with bum-licking brown-nose introductory
> details.

No, you did not, as none of the words you falsely claimed as being in
that judgement actually appears in that judgement which is at
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/1999/244.html

You have admitted to being the vandal who altered the Wikipedia
article about Laurence Godfrey and you have now been shewn to have
written lies about him which, at best, are potentially libellous.

I really would suggest that you stop posting and let people think that
you _may_ be an imbecile and/or a hopeless liar, rather than continue
to post and, thereby, dispel any remaining doubt.

--
 x
/|\