Article View: sci.physics
Article #813Re: Experiments violating relativity 2
From: Benjamin Weiner
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 23:07
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1992 23:07
10 lines
1037 bytes
1037 bytes
Our library doesn't get Physics Essays here either, and there probably wouldn't be much anybody could say without the raw data. But I do have one good explanation for data that show a 24-hour cycle but not a one-year cycle: systematic error. There are plenty of things in the average physics department that could vary on a 24-hour cycle. Or, if he really is analyzing shift w.r.t. some fixed angle in the lab, there might be some fixed thing in the setup that would do it. Beware of reanalyzing data to find new effects, anyway; remember the "fifth force."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Aug.6.19.07.06.1992.9852@ruhets.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!bweinerReferences:
<1992Aug5.191822.11433@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Aug6.070059.4048@nuscc.nus.sg>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!bweiner From: bweiner@ruhets.rutgers.edu (Benjamin Weiner) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Experiments violating relativity 2 Message-ID: <Aug.6.19.07.06.1992.9852@ruhets.rutgers.edu> Date: 6 Aug 92 23:07:07 GMT References: <1992Aug5.191822.11433@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Aug6.070059.4048@nuscc.nus.sg> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 10