🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug6.175701.11778@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@nevanlinna.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
>In article <3996@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us writes:
>>    Mathematical consistency? I ask for your arguments to be consistent with
>>   I=V/r (ohms law) and am told ``ohms law doesn't apply  to  everything  in
>>   the world''( as if it were inappropriate to associate it with the subject
>>   of  electromagnetic  induction).  
>
>[...]

For shame, John.

He feeds you a fish-head and you let it go...

That is, Ohm's law has nothing at all to do with
electromagnetic induction.

It may be necessary if you want to account for resistance
in the inductors, but it doesn't enter into the calculation
of the induced current (which depends only on the quality
of the coupling and the quantity of the original current).

He wants Ampere's law.

				--Blair
				  "I sold my Biot-Savart at a loss..."