Article View: sci.physics
Article #8179Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times
From: Surfer
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:42
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:42
29 lines
2597 bytes
2597 bytes
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:33:23 +1100, Oy rool out a carbon tax <gillard_lies@nowhere.com> wrote: >Surfer wrote: >> >> http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/himalaya-statement-20january2010.pd >> "....a paragraph in the 938-page Working Group II contribution to the >> underlying assessment2 refers to poorly substantiated estimates of >> rate of recession and date for the disappearance of Himalayan >> glaciers. In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and >> well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC >> procedures, were not applied properly...." > >Glad you quoted this. It shows what un unscientific body of blunderers >the IPCC is. It also shows that they themselves don't understand the >significance of quoting a 4-digit date for the disappearance of (even >one) glacier implies. > Rubbish. It was simply a human error that was corrected when the document was later reviewed. >> One paragraph wrong in a 938-page document doesn't sound like a major >> issue. > >This is only because you don't understand the significance of the error. > After being corrected it has lost all significance.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<vhv2d6hs3iqgg662ru5v1n1blsheodrc2h@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <J8CdnfK6g-SdGlbRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@bright.net> <3depc6pr7f07henv1ek9rrll1ij5dea9rp@4ax.com> <4cccf766$0$5527$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <cbuqc6lnm27qkk4mdc1a09vddn664lo4j1@4ax.com> <4ccd7e99$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <kih1d6huj6qrccdagr4s1dci9ir0gvlvj2@4ax.com> <4cd0d802$0$25362$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fb374,573352c024c442c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid9e5a772d74,gidf4fe430b92,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail From: Surfer <no@spam.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics,aus.politics,can.politics Subject: Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:12:37 +1030 Message-ID: <vhv2d6hs3iqgg662ru5v1n1blsheodrc2h@4ax.com> References: <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <J8CdnfK6g-SdGlbRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@bright.net> <3depc6pr7f07henv1ek9rrll1ij5dea9rp@4ax.com> <4cccf766$0$5527$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <cbuqc6lnm27qkk4mdc1a09vddn664lo4j1@4ax.com> <4ccd7e99$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <kih1d6huj6qrccdagr4s1dci9ir0gvlvj2@4ax.com> <4cd0d802$0$25362$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.74.247.97 X-Trace: 1288798955 25361 114.74.247.97