Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times

Article View: sci.physics

Article #8187

#8187

From: Surfer
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:17

19 lines
1920 bytes

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:58:14 +1100, Oy rool out a carbon tax
<gillard_lies@nowhere.com> wrote:

>Surfer wrote:
>
>>> 1)    The IPCC data has been pretty well discredited, 
>>>
>> This error was reported.
>> 
>> IPCC admits Himalayan glacier error
>> http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/55455/title/Science_%2B_the_Public__IPCC_admits_Himalayan_glacier_error
>> 
>> But its been found and corrected.
>
>This in no way absolves the IPCC of its gross ineptitude and its total
>discreditation in claiming to be "scientific". 
>

Your ranting isn't scientific.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <cbuqc6lnm27qkk4mdc1a09vddn664lo4j1@4ax.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail

References:

<365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <J8CdnfK6g-SdGlbRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@bright.net> <3depc6pr7f07henv1ek9rrll1ij5dea9rp@4ax.com> <4cccf766$0$5527$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10b271,573352c024c442c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,573352c024c442c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fb374,573352c024c442c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gid9e5a772d74,gidf4fe430b92,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail
From: Surfer <no@spam.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,aus.politics,can.politics
Subject: Re: Who's 'In Climate Denial, Again'? The New York Times
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:47:07 +1030
Message-ID: <cbuqc6lnm27qkk4mdc1a09vddn664lo4j1@4ax.com>
References: <365a0526-bd3c-42f1-999b-4163725527a6@c20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <vf1mc61qgpc1lk532rmivbhhsb2eaiu1oe@4ax.com> <Gp6dnY-jz7QchlbRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@bright.net> <laamc6ta8nmceb2nn6ccdq1q0dqaemr0ot@4ax.com> <J8CdnfK6g-SdGlbRnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@bright.net> <3depc6pr7f07henv1ek9rrll1ij5dea9rp@4ax.com> <4cccf766$0$5527$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.74.147.59
X-Trace: 1288534607  3031 114.74.147.59

Reply to Parent Message