🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #8293

Re: A non-tachyon, still-follows-Einsten's-rules FTL idea ... PLEASE comment on it!!!

#8293
From: Chris Wagner
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00
30 lines
2726 bytes
James Grady Ward wrote:
> Chris Wagner wrote:
> > It doesn't matter if it actually goes to a point or not.  All the event
> > horizon is is the point at which the curvature is great enough to keep
> > light from exiting the gravity well.  Imagine you had all the mass of
> > the solar system in 1 cubic centimetter.  That would make a gravity well
> > big enough to suck in a light wave.  Its not a quantum singularity but
> > it is a black hole.
> 
> it does matter if a black hole collapses to a point or not.  for
> one thing if it does not, then there is some fundamental force
> that we know nothing about that is stoping gravity from compressing
> the mass to a point.  also there is the minor question of if space
> can become infinity curved or not.  if the mass of a black hole is
> compressed to a point then there is no way to define the gravitational
> field strength at the point since your radius from the center would
> be zero. also if space is apraoching infinite curvature as it
> appraoches the center of a singularity, would the center point
> still exist as a point in space time or a hole in existance.

Nothing you said has anything to do with what I said.  Just because
all singularities are black holes doesn't mean that all black holes
are singularites.  The *only* requirement for a black hole is that
it has a gravity well strong enough to keep light from escaping.
That does *not* require a singularity.


> lots of fun ugly questions depend on if black holes can compress
> to singularities or not.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3342083B.5AD4@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <5d2m8a$ncn@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <332BD9F9.5E4C@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <5gi4ta$7mg1@chinook.generation.net> <332CD474.A96@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <332DAC44.6318@hotmail.com> <5gnvii$t00$4@news1.sympatico.ca> <332F8EA9.336F@flash.net> <Pine.OSF.3.95.970319 <5gsv2t$3qv@news.inforamp.net> <33322DC8.5FD1@eos.ncsu.edu> <5h13k7$fst@news.eli.net> <33348275.67C8@eos.ncsu.edu> <5h48qg$loa@news.eli.net> <33384E18.3232@eos.ncsu.edu> <333F307D.61DA@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <3340D472.4E9D@eos.ncsu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc19f,170da24f95ceef31
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc19f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,559b8de9eb7ab374
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 107319,14c8003ac88779d4
X-Google-Attributes: gid107319,public
From: Chris Wagner <wagnerc@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: A non-tachyon, still-follows-Einsten's-rules FTL idea ... PLEASE comment on it!!!
Date: 1997/04/02
Message-ID: <3342083B.5AD4@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 230064694
References: <5d2m8a$ncn@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <332BD9F9.5E4C@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <5gi4ta$7mg1@chinook.generation.net> <332CD474.A96@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <332DAC44.6318@hotmail.com> <5gnvii$t00$4@news1.sympatico.ca> <332F8EA9.336F@flash.net> <Pine.OSF.3.95.970319 <5gsv2t$3qv@news.inforamp.net> <33322DC8.5FD1@eos.ncsu.edu> <5h13k7$fst@news.eli.net> <33348275.67C8@eos.ncsu.edu> <5h48qg$loa@news.eli.net> <33384E18.3232@eos.ncsu.edu> <333F307D.61DA@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <3340D472.4E9D@eos.ncsu.edu>
Organization: University of Cincinnati, Chemical Engineering
Reply-To: wagnerc@ieee.cas.uc.edu
Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.arts.startrek.tech,aus.sf.star-trek