Article View: sci.physics
Article #8461Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright
From: Luha
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 03:13
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 03:13
86 lines
5393 bytes
5393 bytes
"George Hammond" <ghammond@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:3AE849AD.34F39083@mediaone.net... > Jock Strap wrote: > > > > We have these loons of our own here on sci.physics... > > theres ken broughton with his 'energy creating' heat pumps, donald shead > > citizen of 'dense donnies dreamland' who cant get his head around basic > > concepts but seems to think he is on the cutting edge of physics research. > > best thing is to just ignore them, half the time they want you to rise to > > the bait > > [Hammond] > Ahhhh hahahhahah Ahhhh hhahahahh ROFL ahahhahaaaaa hahahh > ahahhah haaa ahhhh hahahah ROFL > > Dear Clayton, Strap et al: > > There is absolutely NOTHING you can do about this "Cape Fear" > type of Robert DeNiro psychotic religious fanatic... and the fault > is purely your own..... not only your own... but also LARGLY the > fault of conventional establishment science itself. > You see; a rigorous hard scientific proof of God has been > actually discovered (Hammond 1994, and my website URL below > in my signature file). I decided to go to your website to see how wrong you could be. The first thing I noticed is your rather unusual definition for "god". Your god seems to be technology, not the ubiquitous, omnipotent creator. That's OK. However, your postulate is flawed in that it does not pass the cause and effect premise. You state that a brain will comprehend more based on size and weight. This makes you a phrenologist. The proportionately larger brain can help some senses reach higher achievement. For example, most of your brain is computing visual stimuli right now. If you had a 1% larger brain, you may be able to see better, that's all. Get over this leap of faith (pun intended) and your hypothesis will be better. Not correct, just better. SCIENCE in collaboration with atheists > like yourself and the average hypocrit are actively trying to > suppress this discovery and ignore it, to the detriment of billions > of suffering human beings in the human race. This long suffering humanity > patiently grinning and bearing this ludicrous conspiracy of hypocrites > and elitests such as the establishment scientific community and > people such as yourself.... unfortunately.... we can't control > all of our constituency. Has your paper been peer-reviewed? My guess is that it has not. Am I right? If you have not submitted it, you have to do this as early as possible, painful as it may be. Sooner or later a madman like Boatwright > is going to break loose, go berserk, and charge the establishment > lines. I suggest you buy a helmet... we can't stop him, science > can't stop him.. unfortunately the only way to stop him is to > have your goons tie a gag on him... which won't do much in the > long run either, because there's plenty more where he came from. We're quaking in our boots. > Point is.... he's right and your wrong... which is where his > terrifying and maniacal power comes from... sinmple moral superiority. > God has sent him because God is pissed off at YOU. > God being the 15% more brain in the skulls of affluent societies? These nephrons sent this guy? Have you read your own theory? > Ahhhh hahahhahah Ahhhh hhahahahh ROFL ahahhahaaaaa hahahh > ahahhah haaa ahhhh hahahah ROFL > You're laughing at yourself with the rest of us? Maybe you aren't as insane as you appear to be. > -- > BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE Did it. Now I wish I hadn't. , BELOW: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > George Hammond, M.S. Physics > Email: ghammond@mediaone.net > Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html > -----------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ten1jcoegg5317@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <44XF6.1342$sk1.185722@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3AE849AD.34F39083@mediaone.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e378,3360b6505004c31 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e378,public X-Google-Thread: fdc67,531a05b61a28efa6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc67,public X-Google-Thread: 116469,3c38a174d13233ff X-Google-Attributes: gid116469,public X-Google-Thread: 106bde,3360b6505004c31 X-Google-Attributes: gid106bde,public X-Google-Thread: 106c38,3360b6505004c31 X-Google-Attributes: gid106c38,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,24a76b284d1f9ead X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: f442a,3360b6505004c31 X-Google-Attributes: gidf442a,public X-Google-Thread: 110d33,3360b6505004c31 X-Google-Attributes: gid110d33,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-28 20:12:03 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Luha" <s_dujour@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 23:13:23 -0400 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <ten1jcoegg5317@corp.supernews.com> References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <44XF6.1342$sk1.185722@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3AE849AD.34F39083@mediaone.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 88