Re: evolution?(please read)

Article View: sci.physics

Article #8507

#8507

From: James S. Lovejoy
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00

20 lines
1563 bytes


John Gardner wrote:

>         No FACT of evolution where one species has led
> to another.  Change within species to an extremely limited
> degree yes, but nothing that would justify the _miraclulous_
> transformation of one species into another.
> 
> --
>     John Gardner

Well that's your problem.  Evolution the theory, doesn't predict, and
evolution the fact doesn't show the _miraculous_ transformation of one
species into another.  The facts show the _natural_ transformation of
one species into another, rather like the theory predicts.
-- 
Never be angry when fools behave like fools.  It's better when fools
identify themselves. . .
It removes so much uncertainty.   _Wyrms_     Orson Scott Card

Technical Details

Message-ID: <336D1FB9.51A2@ix.netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <862304355.15801@dejanews.com> <5kh5ea$msd$2@news.nyu.edu> <5kipjm$h5o@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e5a72eede1eb5b86
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a7a9,e5a72eede1eb5b86
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a7a9,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b363,e5a72eede1eb5b86
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b363,public
X-Google-Thread: 106bde,e5a72eede1eb5b86
X-Google-Attributes: gid106bde,public
From: "James S. Lovejoy" <jimlj@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: evolution?(please read)
Date: 1997/05/04
Message-ID: <336D1FB9.51A2@ix.netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 239361405
References: <862304355.15801@dejanews.com> <5kh5ea$msd$2@news.nyu.edu> <5kipjm$h5o@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
Organization: Organization? I don't need no stinkin' organization
X-NETCOM-Date: Sun May 04  6:48:01 PM CDT 1997
Newsgroups: sci.physics,talk.origins,bionet.biophysics,bionet.molbio.evolution

Reply to Parent Message