🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 4 May 1997 08:25:23 -0500, Brian J Flanagan
<bflanagn@sleepy.giant.net> wrote:

>
>
>> : > >wf3h@enter.net wrote:
>> : > 
>> : > uh, prove it. science IS evolution and NO designer. unless you have
>> : > some reason for including magic...
>> : 

A more enlightened view might 
>have it that evolution is the dance of creation, and that the order which 
>science reveals is by design - that might be an interesting debate, at 
>least, whereas this continual exchange is really only so much tired 
>drivel between subgeniuses who have already made up their minds. 

fine with me. except that the 'subgeniuses' called creationists try to
keep forcing their literal interpretation (as opposed to your
metaphorical one) into public schools primarily for political
purposes.

perhaps you should call the ICR and complain to them...

as to 'design' unless you see something we scientists missed, design
isnt on our songsheet.






delete the xx from my email address to reply