Article View: sci.physics
Article #855Re: Gallileo and falling bodies
From: Richard Long
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 17:58
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 17:58
59 lines
3680 bytes
3680 bytes
In article <1992Apr1.220153.8855@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> court@newton.physics.mun.ca (J. Lewis) writes: > It is worth consulting what Galileo himself wrote. "Dialogues Concerning Two > New Sciences" is perfectly readable, in translation; in fact it sounds not > unlike a tidied-up sci.physics flame war! E.g. > > First Day, [106] > " SALVIATI: ... And as to the first, I greatly doubt that Aristotle ever > tested by experiment whether it be true that two stones, one weighing ten > ties as much as the other, if allowed to fall, at the same instant, from a > height of, say, 100 cubits, would so differ in speed that when the heavier > had reached the ground, the other would not have fallen more than 10 > cubits. > SIMPLICIO: His language would seem to indicate that he had tried > the experiment, because he says: *We see the heavier*; now the word *see* > shows that he had made the experiment. > SAGREDO: But I, Simplicio, who have made the test can assure > [107] > you that a cannon ball weighing one or two hundred pounds, or even more, > will not reach the ground by as much as a span ahead of a musket ball > weighing only half a pound, provided both are dropped from a height of 200 > cubits. > > .... > SALV. If then we take two bodies whose natural speeds are different, > it is clear that on uniting the two, the more rapid one will be partly retarded > by the slower, and the slower will be somewhat hastened by the swifter. Do > you not agree with me in this opinion? > SIMP. You are unquestionably right. > SALV. But if this is true, and if a large stone moves with a speed > of, say, eight while a smaller moves with a speed of four, then when they > are unitied, the system will move with a speed less than eight; but the > two stones when tied together make a stone larger than that which before > moved with the speed of eight. Hence the heavier body moves with less > speed than the lighter; an effect which is contrary to your supposition. > Thus you see > [108] > how, from your assumption that the heavier body moves more rapidly than the > lighter one, I infer that the heavier body moves more slowly. > SIMP. I am all at sea because it appears to me tha the smaller > stone when added to the larger increases its weight and by adding wight I > do not see how it can fail to increase its speed or, at least, not to > diminish it. > SALV. Here again you are in error, Simplicio ... " > [Dover edition, trans. Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio] > > We see that Galileo is actually attacking the idea that the speed of a > falling body is directly *proportional* to mass, and he does so primarily by > means of a gedanken experiment. He is well aware that bodies do fall at > somewhat different speeds in air. He questions whether *Aristotle* ever > performed the experiment. Galileo suggests that he, Galileo, had done so, or > had seen it done, but the details are vague: Sagredo is not identical with > Galileo. There is no mention of Pisa, or of its famous belltower, and indeed > the beginning of the "Dialogues" suggests that they are set in Venice. > > John Lewis > Physics Dept. > Memorial University of Newfoundland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr6.175819.24287@cs.ucf.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!fang!tarpit!cs.ucf.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Apr1.220153.8855@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!fang!tarpit!cs.ucf.edu!news From: long@next3 (Richard Long) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Gallileo and falling bodies Message-ID: <1992Apr6.175819.24287@cs.ucf.edu> Date: 6 Apr 92 17:58:19 GMT References: <1992Apr1.220153.8855@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> Sender: news@cs.ucf.edu (News system) Organization: University of Central Florida Lines: 59