🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #8621

Re: Majpruz and network evolution

#8621
From: Tom Schneider
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1992 18:36
52 lines
3018 bytes
In article <53011@cup.portal.com> Andrew_-_Palfreyman@cup.portal.com writes:
>J. Giles writes (quoting someone else, I think):
>:If I arbitrarily rearrange a DNA molecule, the _biological_ information
>:it contained is completely destroyed - it now contains _ZERO_ information
>:from a biological point of view.

This is wrong.  It is still a molecular machine which can select sub states,
see the reference given below.

>:[..]I think you'll find that the change in entropy depends on what is
>:considered a "blank" tape and what is considered "information" on a 
>:recorded tape.  It is not difficult to conceive of coding conventions 
>:in which the lowest entropy condition of the tape corresponds to a 
>:blank - completely erased - tape.

If we take information to be a negative decrease in uncertainty,
then this is meaningless, as you have not specified clearly the two
relevant states.

> In short, the change in entropy 
>:of a physical system used to record information depends on the
>:_interpretation_ which relates the physical system to the data
>:that it records.  What is the thermodynamic definition of an
>:interpretation? [..]

Negative decrease in uncertainty corresponds to selection of states.
Interpretation is not required.

>i'm glad you've brought this point up, Jim. when learning about statistical
>mechanics from Zemansky, i recall the "equation" there stating 
>	information = -log(entropy)
>perhaps not exactly; the point made was the link between the two in the
>context of thermodynamics.

You were thinking perhaps of the epitaph on Boltzmann's grave:

       S = - log W

At risk of repeating myself, see J. Theor. Biol. (1991) 148 83-137, and please
join us over on bionet.info-theory to discuss these issues in detail.

>as regards information, i'm always puzzled by the contrast between this
>posited thermodynamic equivalence and the fact that if something is
>*not surprising in the least*, it's not information.

This happens because most peoples definitions are messed up.

  Tom Schneider
  National Cancer Institute
  Laboratory of Mathematical Biology
  Frederick, Maryland  21702-1201
  toms@ncifcrf.gov
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2674@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!ncifcrf!fcs260c2!toms
References: <1992Jan16.023209.24635@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <1992Jan16.185750.967@beta.lanl.gov> <53011@cup.portal.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f803e,9b8acc57c773be93,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf803e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,9326ef375f5608d1
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-20 11:03:44 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!ncifcrf!fcs260c2!toms
From: toms@fcs260c2.ncifcrf.gov (Tom Schneider)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,bionet.info-theory
Subject: Re: Majpruz and network evolution
Message-ID: <2674@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov>
Date: 20 Jan 92 18:36:48 GMT
References: <1992Jan16.023209.24635@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <1992Jan16.185750.967@beta.lanl.gov> <53011@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@ncifcrf.gov
Followup-To: bionet.info-theory
Organization: NCI Supercomputer Facility, Frederick, MD
Lines: 52