Re: Roll call on Senate SSC vote

Article View: sci.physics

Article #868

#868

From: D
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 21:34

13 lines
849 bytes

Richard Martin writes
> 
> Gore keeping neutral, huh?  Interesting.
> This should be in politics, or something...but it's worthwhile
> noting.

Actually, Gore wasn't neutral...he just wasn't there for the vote.  I  
think he was pro-SSC, but I'm not sure.
> 
> Richard.

clueless chuck

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug7.213406.23512@cs.rose-hulman.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news

References: <1992Aug7.153244.17886@csi.on.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news
From: pearsodc@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (D)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Roll call on Senate SSC vote
Message-ID: <1992Aug7.213406.23512@cs.rose-hulman.edu>
Date: 7 Aug 92 21:34:06 GMT
References: <1992Aug7.153244.17886@csi.on.ca>
Sender: news@cs.rose-hulman.edu (The News Administrator)
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines: 13
Nntp-Posting-Host: o233-29.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

Reply to Parent Message