Article View: sci.physics
Article #8687Re: Under-Appreciated Gems of Scientific Epistemology
From: Patrick Powers
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:42
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:42
7 lines
1449 bytes
1449 bytes
jlanfield2003@yahoo.com (Jeff Lanfield) wrote in message news:<235c483f.0407201549.681ffa4@posting.google.com>... > I am writing a paper on how new ideas gain acceptance in science. I > would like to get opinions on what were the most profound books and > thinkers on scientific epistemology you have encountered. > Kuhn -- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9511688f.0407280542.7ff885d1@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<235c483f.0407201549.681ffa4@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: 105b48,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: f4886,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: 1045ed,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid105b48,gidf4886,gidfd5f7,gid1045ed,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: frisbieinstein@yahoo.com (Patrick Powers) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.med,sci.chem,sci.econ,bionet.neuroscience Subject: Re: Under-Appreciated Gems of Scientific Epistemology Date: 28 Jul 2004 06:42:47 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 7 Message-ID: <9511688f.0407280542.7ff885d1@posting.google.com> References: <235c483f.0407201549.681ffa4@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.94.191.36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1091022167 23886 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2004 13:42:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:42:47 +0000 (UTC)