Article View: sci.physics
Article #8701Re: Under-Appreciated Gems of Scientific Epistemology
From: Scott Seidman
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:44
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:44
39 lines
2341 bytes
2341 bytes
jlanfield2003@yahoo.com (Jeff Lanfield) wrote in news:235c483f.0407201549.681ffa4@posting.google.com: > I am writing a paper on how new ideas gain acceptance in science. I > would like to get opinions on what were the most profound books and > thinkers on scientific epistemology you have encountered. > > By this I mean a work that totally changed the way you look at the > world and at science. Below is my list. I would be grateful for your > additions. I > am really looking for works that are novel and different, orthogonal > to the ones I listed. For example, I included Bertalanffy's General > System Theory so I do not want the many, many other books on General > System Theory. > > I'm specifically looking for the thinkers and books that are not only > highly original but also under-appreciated and not as widely known as > they deserve to be. For instance, Aristotle, Plato, and Darwin will > not make this list as their work is well known and universally > recognized. > > > My list (no particular order): > > Rene Thom: Structural Stability and Morphogenesis > Ludwig von Bertalanffy: General System Theory > David Bohm: Wholeness and Implicate order > > > Thanks for your help, > > - Jeff Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (a MUST given your topic!!) Koestler, The Watershed de La Mettrie, Man a Machine Scott
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns952D58FADD86Ascottseidmanmindspri@130.133.1.4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mailReferences:
<235c483f.0407201549.681ffa4@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: 105b48,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: f4886,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Thread: 1045ed,b67b806e5863d1f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid105b48,gidf4886,gidfd5f7,gid1045ed,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Scott Seidman <namdiesttocs@mindspring.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.med,sci.chem,sci.econ,bionet.neuroscience Subject: Re: Under-Appreciated Gems of Scientific Epistemology Followup-To: sci.physics,bionet.neuroscience Date: 21 Jul 2004 12:44:49 GMT Organization: Your Company Lines: 39 Message-ID: <Xns952D58FADD86Ascottseidmanmindspri@130.133.1.4> References: <235c483f.0407201549.681ffa4@posting.google.com> X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 9fU/HkN07VOabDaRRXqKcQARUZ2ix6NRuX/JuebJswpnJGkqk= User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25