Article View: sci.physics
Article #8749Re: Do biomolecules have a collective form of "consciousness"? Ross Tessien answers!
From: kkollins
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
47 lines
3096 bytes
3096 bytes
Sir, as your post applies to the stuff =I've= posted, I don't disagree with you... it's my Greatest-Sorrow stuff... I'm "damned if I do, and damned if I don't". Faced with such, I just Decided to Damn the "damns"... as Adm. Faragaut did during the U. S. Civil War... "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead." Of course, I'd prefer it if folks'd just discuss the few simple things that're in AoK, but if folks Choose not to do so, while there's nothing I can do about such, I'm still Obliged with Respect to that around which there is no way. K. P. Collins [P. S. I Understand that my quoting Great folks will be used, by some, to sspread more B.S. about me. It's just that I See that the folks I quote are Worthy of the quoting... I do so in the Hope of Reminding folks that what Is =Is=, largely be-cause some had Courage in the face of Whithering "odds". I look on these Folks as being among my Teachers... and It gives me Joy to Lift-Them-Up in the Light... but more than that, through the Living of these Great-Ones, I See that Hope Exists. (I admit, however, that I'm just Curious with respect to the way folks seem so-Oblivious to the Actions-Taken by these Others upon which is Founded the very-Exixtence of all that folks hold Dear... it's so-Interesting that folks'd be so-Blind to what, if it weren't, would probably mean that they'd not-Be, either... to me, that it's so, is Surrealistic.) kpc] "Sir Knowitall" wrote: > [...] > I believe this "conceptual simplification" is in most cases a very sensible > approach, and one that most biologists would readily and appropriately > defend by a statement that could read something like: > > For pragmatic reasons it is important to keep things simple and immediately > relevant, enough for there to be a great enough chance of achieving usefully > workable results ----- i.e. results not necessarily workable in a way by > which a philosophically motivated searcher manages to put her/himself into a > state (always a self-regulatory state) of feeling "all-knowingly good". > > "Sir Knowitall" > > P.S. > I always try to put my best "FOOT" [Foremost Overview Of Truth] forward. > It is a fact of life that this sometimes means that I cannot avoid stepping > on someone else's "TOE". > :->
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<367B23FB.2926306A@pop3.concentric.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<752qnm$l1j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <367b0d51.0@pink.one.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b7e7a6770f0ad90 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 1045ed,b7e7a6770f0ad90 X-Google-Attributes: gid1045ed,public X-Google-Thread: ff0b7,b7e7a6770f0ad90 X-Google-Attributes: gidff0b7,public From: kkollins@pop3.concentric.net Subject: Re: Do biomolecules have a collective form of "consciousness"? Ross Tessien answers! Date: 1998/12/18 Message-ID: <367B23FB.2926306A@pop3.concentric.net> X-Deja-AN: 423833536 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <752qnm$l1j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <367b0d51.0@pink.one.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: sufficient Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: kkollins@concentric.net Newsgroups: sci.physics,bionet.neuroscience,fr.bio.general