Article View: sci.physics
Article #8761Re: Are we conscious here? Or just punning?
From: Jim Hunter
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 00:00
22 lines
1515 bytes
1515 bytes
Pueraria lobata wrote: > > > > Hi All! > > I guess that if you,folks,FIRST went to explore your own consciousness > with tibetan techniques,such as conscious dreaming,psychopharmacology > and the neurosciences,you would start to understand that consciousness > is to be understood through the neurosciences and not physics. Consciousness is an art rather than a science. General rules of the road: -The tibetan techniques should be left to the tibetans. -Conscious dreaming is possibly an inferior form of consciousness. --- Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<357047D0.27E5@REMOVE_TO_EMAIL.jhuapl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<000801bd89fb$da439260$1098accf@wcri.erols.com> <v03110704b19334fe9811@[128.150.140.171]> <v03110707b194ac2cbd66@[128.150.140.171]> <356F0A95.81D67581@well.com> <356fea9c.1225806@news.twics.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,297e9ac092fd144c X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,297e9ac092fd144c X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 1045ed,2e811c3119d99971 X-Google-Attributes: gid1045ed,public From: Jim Hunter <jim.hunter@REMOVE_TO_EMAIL.jhuapl.edu> Subject: Re: Are we conscious here? Or just punning? Date: 1998/05/30 Message-ID: <357047D0.27E5@REMOVE_TO_EMAIL.jhuapl.edu> X-Deja-AN: 357985522 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <000801bd89fb$da439260$1098accf@wcri.erols.com> <v03110704b19334fe9811@[128.150.140.171]> <v03110707b194ac2cbd66@[128.150.140.171]> <356F0A95.81D67581@well.com> <356fea9c.1225806@news.twics.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,bionet.neuroscience