🚀 go-pugleaf

flefever@ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever) wrote:

>What???  I envy your proficiency in a language not your own, far better
>than mine in Dutch (indeed, I have NO proficiency in Dutch, LITTLE
>proficiency in several othr languages)--BUT I think there must surely
>be something missing in translation.  I can make no sense whatsoever of
>what you have written about consciousness.
>
>In <355174F6.379B1C4A@wxs.nl> Dirk Wessels <DimensionShifter@wxs.nl>
>writes: 
>>
>>Claude Rifat wrote:
>>
>>> What is consciousness?
>>>
>>> Definition:Consciousness is a resonance between M.H.V domains.
>>
>>Conscious is becoming aware that a definition old restricts the
>>actual understanding of the subject.
>>
>>For example. What if the resonance is a result of "external conscious"
>>and not producing conscious itself...?
>>
>>Greetings,
>>    Dirk

What is M.H.V.?

But I am not sure if the resonance is of that much importance.
There are a few axons here and there in the brain, too, and the not
consious sectors have their fields, too.

And external consciouness:
When another human is sending into your brain I have the feeling that
he is more giving central command and seeing to the correct energy
regulations, but that is more like a supervisor (which on a level is a
main own function);  the stuff coming feels more like it is of a lot
of sectors.  ...Though of course hittting the according own sectors if
the fields join more or less well it makes something like a powerful
resonance.
And linking out dissonances if it is not done carefully.
But that as such is not much to do with sectors being conscious or
not, that has more to do with the structures.