🚀 go-pugleaf

In <2i3ovk$rb8@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>, thompson@dish.jpl.nasa.gov (mike thompson (telos)) writes:
>Tom Rubinstein (cegr01@email.mot.com) wrote:
>: Get your facts straight.  The collapse in '71 was at the 5/118
>: interchange NOT the 5/14.  While these are close together, they
>: are NOT the same place.
>
>
>Sorry, You're wrong.  The 118 was barely conceived in 1971.
>It was definitely the 5/14 interchange that fell.
>

Oops!  I meant 5/210 not 5/118.  Someone else is convinced that it was
the AV Fwy.  I intend to check it out in the Times microfilm archives.
I'll let you know what I find and if I'm wrong I'll order a large
portion of crow.

--Tom


>--
>Michael Thompson                | thompson@dish.jpl.nasa.gov  
>Telos Systems Group             | Voice: (818) 351-2341                        
>320 N. Halstead #260            | Fax:   (818) 351-1371     
>Pasadena, Ca. 91107             | Comments are my own                                              


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Rubinstein                   "Opinions expressed are not necessarily
Motorola                          those of Motorola"
P.O. Box 85036
San Diego  CA  92186-9130         email:  cegr01@email.mot.COM
                                     or:  t.rubinstein@ieee.ORG
                                   home:  tom@cyber.NET

Tel:  619 530-8432                Fax:  619 530-8470