Re: Earthquake physics

Article View: sci.physics

Article #8857

#8857

From: David Hersh
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 21:44

14 lines
1381 bytes

> Tom Rubinstein (cegr01@email.mot.com) wrote:
> :  Get your facts straight.  The collapse in '71 was at the 5/118
> : interchange NOT the 5/14.  While these are close together, they
> : are NOT the same place.

>> Sorry, You're wrong.  The 118 was barely conceived in 1971.
>>It was definitely the 5/14 interchange that fell.

This is true it was the 5/14 interchange that fell(I know because I was about
1/4 to 1/2 half of a mile from the portion that fell at 4:31 a.m), it was also 
the 5 about 3 miles before the 5/14 interchange.  The 118 however did have some 
structural damage that is keeping people off of it now

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1994Jan27.214443.11787@micom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!news.service.uci.edu!gordius!micom!dhersh

References: <CARASSO.94Jan24152839@Quaestor.Inference.COM> <1994Jan25.161302.25211@schbbs.mot.com> <2i3ovk$rb8@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111c3f,53566c7bc134d49e
X-Google-Attributes: gid111c3f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,c725633e6ae3f207
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-01-28 07:16:33 PST
Newsgroups: sci.physics,ca.earthquakes
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!news.service.uci.edu!gordius!micom!dhersh
From: dhersh@micom.com (David Hersh)
Subject: Re: Earthquake physics
Message-ID: <1994Jan27.214443.11787@micom.com>
Organization: Micom Communications Corp., Simi Valley, Ca.
References: <CARASSO.94Jan24152839@Quaestor.Inference.COM> <1994Jan25.161302.25211@schbbs.mot.com> <2i3ovk$rb8@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 21:44:43 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message