🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <FZydnfn4fZmjf-rSnZ2dnUVZ5qSdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 Marvin the Martian <marvin@ontomars.org> wrote:

Wow. It looks like the entire cast of "Alice in Wonderland" is here 
engaging in a "daisy chain".
Curiouser, and curiouser.

> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:27:10 -0500, RLW wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:18:28 -0400, Leonard wrote:
> > 
> >> Abracadabra,  No More Mediæval Warm Period!
> >> 
> >> The lies behind the failed Hockey Stick

Only your intellect failed. The hockey stick is alive and well.

> > 
> > <yada, yada, yada>
> > 
> > I'm starting to get the impression that few posting here actually know
> > what the "hockey stick" graph was intended to represent: runaway, nearly
> > limitless increase in surface temperature.
> > 
> > A) We know that's wrong.
> > 
> > B) We know that the troposphere is getting warmer.
> 
> We know that the data points used show warming, but as Watt pointed out, 
> 58% are wrongly situated so they WOULD show warming. In fact, they would 
> track US energy usage; if we do cut back on carbon emissions, these sites 
> should show cooling!
> 
> We know that 70% of the data collection stations in the US are garbage 
> for the purpose of tracking climate change. 

And you know this because god told you so, or did you get it straight 
from Chevron?
> 
> GIGO. 
> 
> Now, there's better data out there, like Satellite data, but... "Climate 
> Scientists" don't use that. Of course, it shows cooling. :-D 
> 
> 
> 
> > (A) does nothing to disprove (B).  Indeed, (B) is something *observed*,
> > not a matter open to debate.
> 
> How the data is collected is always open to debate.
> 
> Or did you miss the neutrino speed limit violation debacle? 
> 
> Gather your data, and mistrust it. 
>  
> > (B) means that a lot of weather patterns will change and a lot of ice
> > will melt.  This doesn't mean Humanity will die off, but it will be very
> > damn' expensive and inconvenient for a good many folks.
> > 
> > I'll hate having to explain to my grandkids that everyone stood around
> > debating whether it was happening instead of figuring out what impact it
> > will have and how to solve some of the attendant problems.
> 
> Instead you'll be denying that you were fooled in the great global 
> warming fraud. 

What a Cluster F**k!

Probably the best thing you clowns can do is to turn off Fox News.
They make you stoopid.
<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6132266/university_of_maryland_
study_shows.html?cat=9>
University of Maryland Study Shows Watching Fox News Makes You Ignorant

And they lie to you.
THE CORPORATION [17/23] Unsettling Account
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZkDikRLQrw>

See ya in the funny papers ;O)

-- 
E Pluribus Unum

Know where your money is tonight? 
It's making the lives of Wall Street Bankers more comfortable.


The GOP is chasing us towards a cliff called "Obama."
Vote 3rd Party