Article View: sci.physics
Article #892Hawking speaks out ...
From: sclera
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 16:38
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 16:38
66 lines
3570 bytes
3570 bytes
The following caught my eye as something that might be of interest to fellow physicists. Prof. Hawking is talking about the political situation in the UK. *************************************************************** X-NEWS: uaccit soc.culture.british: 16050 Relay-Version: VMS News - V6.0-3 14/03/90 VAX/VMS V5.4; site arizona.edu Path: arizona.edu!arizona!noao!asuvax!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!uunet!mcsun!uknet!glasgow!unix.brighton.ac.uk!wjmc Newsgroups: uk.politics,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Simple message Message-ID: <1992Apr6.160447.14197@unix.brighton.ac.uk> From: wjmc@unix.brighton.ac.uk (-*_Spikey_Tribble_*-) Date: 6 Apr 92 16:04:47 GMT Organization: Brighton Polytechnic, UK Lines: 40 It's obviously too late to affect the result now but did anyone read the Observer this weekend ? They published a collection of responses to the questions "Who would you support and why ?" -- the most sensible reply, in that it simply answered both questions without slinging mud, was that from Stephen Hawking [ Lucasian Prof. of Mathematics, Camb. ]. For those who may have missed it :- > The Conservative governments of the last 13 years have > > 1) Made a massive transfer of resources from the poorer sections of > society to the better-off by raising VAT and lowering income tax, > restricting social security and housing benefits, and by imposing > the poll tax. > > 2) Seriously weakened local democratic control and greatly increased > the power of central government by measures such as abolition of the > GLC and the metropolitan counties, removal of business rates from > local control and collection, rate and poll tax capping, encouraging > schools to opt out and the imposition of a national curriculam. There > would have been howls of Big Brother if Labour had done that. > > 3) Badly underfunded education and science. The Conservatives have > behaved with arrogance and disregard for public opinion on matters > like the poll tax and reform of the NHS, confident that they would > be re-elected whatever they did. If they were to get back this > election, they would feel they were indeed invincible. It is time > for a change, and Labour is the only serious alternative, at least > until the voting system is changed. Hawking has one of the greatest minds in today's world -- his words should at least be given consideration. . -- ########################################################################### # Bill Crawford aka *Cuddly_Cactus* | wjmc@uk.ac.bton.unix # # BSc (Hons) Computer Science Year One | wjmc@uk.ac.bton.vms # # Any views I express are not necessarily those of Brighton Polytechnic # ########################################################################### ******************************************************************* The Einstein/Sakharov/Li-Zhi tradition is apparently alive and well. Something about cosmology, I guess :) C.S. Cornuelle bob@sclera.physics.arizona.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr8.093810.1@milori.ccit.arizona.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!milori.ccit.arizona.edu!scleraShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!milori.ccit.arizona.edu!sclera From: sclera@milori.ccit.arizona.edu Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Hawking speaks out ... Summary: UK politics Message-ID: <1992Apr8.093810.1@milori.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: 8 Apr 92 16:38:10 GMT Article-I.D.: milori.1992Apr8.093810.1 Reply-To: bob@sclera.physics.arizona.edu Distribution: world,local Lines: 66 Nntp-Posting-Host: milori Nntp-Posting-User: sclera