Article View: sci.physics
Article #895Re: Roll call on Senate SSC vote
From: Matt Austern
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 20:23
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 20:23
22 lines
1722 bytes
1722 bytes
In article <1992Aug7.213406.23512@cs.rose-hulman.edu> pearsodc@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (D) writes: > Actually, Gore wasn't neutral...he just wasn't there for the vote. I > think he was pro-SSC, but I'm not sure. The last time Gore voted on the subject, he voted against the SSC. However, Clinton supports it, and it is entirely plausible that, in light of this support, Gore has changed his mind. Either way, Gove has other things than the SSC to worry about right now, and the issue just wasn't important enough for him to go back to Washington. I have no reason to think that he cares strongly about the SSC one way or the other. (I assume that this is also the reason that Seymour didn't vote on it.) -- Matthew Austern I dreamt I was being followed by a roving band of (510) 644-2618 of young Republicans, all wearing the same suit, matt@physics.berkeley.edu taunting me and shouting, "Politically correct austern@theorm.lbl.gov multiculturist scum!"... They were going to make austern@lbl.bitnet me kiss Jesse Helms's picture when I woke up.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MATT.92Aug7202305@physics.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!agate!mattReferences:
<1992Aug7.153244.17886@csi.on.ca> <1992Aug7.213406.23512@cs.rose-hulman.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!agate!matt From: matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Roll call on Senate SSC vote Date: 7 Aug 92 20:23:05 Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group) Lines: 22 Message-ID: <MATT.92Aug7202305@physics.berkeley.edu> References: <1992Aug7.153244.17886@csi.on.ca> <1992Aug7.213406.23512@cs.rose-hulman.edu> Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.berkeley.edu In-reply-to: pearsodc@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu's message of Fri, 7 Aug 1992 21:34:06 GMT