🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mar 18, 6:44 pm, Kathy Bush <Barack...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He did it.
>
> No other presidential candidate in the past 40 years has managed to
> speak so much truth so eloquently at such a crucial juncture in his
> campaign as Barack Obama did today. And he did it by speaking about
> race, the most persistent source of hatred among us since America
> began.
>
> It turns out that a candidate for president with a white mother and a
> black father has a capacity that no one else has ever had before: He
> can articulate an equal understanding of black racism and white racism--
> and that makes it possible for him to condemn both of them with equal
> passion.
>
> Ever since Rev. Jeremiah Wright's hateful sermons began to dominate
> the cable-news airwaves a few days ago, Washington reporters and the
> right-wing attack machine have been salivating at the chance to use
> those words to destroy another promising candidate. But today, Obama
> did what he does better than anyone else: He reminded America that we
> can be, and we must be, better than that.
> The truth is, for 40 years, it has been the Republicans who have used
> prejudice of every kind against black people and gay people and
> immigrant people to divide and conquer in November. And Obama did not
> flinch from pointing that out. Instead, he looked the nation squarely
> in the eye and declared, "Not this time!"
>
> "Like the anger within the black community," he said, white
> resentments "aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have
> helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger
> over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition.
> Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral
> ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire
> careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate
> discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political
> correctness or reverse racism."
>
> And right there, on MSNBC, was Pat Buchanan, the most prominent
> example of this sorry class of citizen, who strained to put the worst
> face on Obama's transcendent speech even as he acknowledged its
> effectiveness. Only on cable television in America could a man who has
> written that Adolf Hitler was "an individual of great courage," and
> dismissed the idea that "white rule of a black majority is inherently
> wrong" in South Africa--only on a cable news network could such a
> person be allowed to attack someone else for failing to disassociate
> himself sufficiently from another man's racist remarks.
> But Obama was too courageous to bow to the chattering classes by
> repudiating his former pastor altogether. Instead, he did something
> much more difficult, and much more important: He offered a nuanced
> view of his mentor's failings. "The profound mistake of Reverend
> Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society,"
> said Obama. "It's that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no
> progress has been made; as if this country--a country that has made it
> possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in
> the land and build a coalition of white and black, Latino and Asian,
> rich and poor, young and old--is still irrevocably bound to a tragic
> past. But what we know--what we have seen--is that America can change.
> That is the true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved
> gives us hope--the audacity to hope--for what we can and must achieve
> tomorrow."
>
> Sally Quinn was also on MSNBC today, and just as she was after Mitt
> Romney's pathetic speech about religion a few months back, she was the
> most intelligent commentator on TV. When Obama finished speaking, she
> declared, "This may be hyperbole, but this may be the most important
> speech about race since Martin Luther King's 'I have a dream' speech."
> It was not hyperbole.
>
> If Obama is elected president, it will be because he has been the
> first candidate in many years to try to appeal to what is best in
> America: "What is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than
> what all the world's great religions demand--that we do unto others as
> we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper,
> scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that
> common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect
> that spirit as well." Unlike the approach of every Republican
> candidate for president, that is a perfect example of the way religion
> should be used in American politics.
>
> In Obama's words today, you could hear the mystic chords of memory--an
> echo of the words of another man from Illinois with humble origins who
> understood the proper role of religion in politics. The spirit Obama
> embodied today was the same one Abraham Lincoln evoked in the
> peroration of his greatest speech in 1865:
>
> "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the
> right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the
> work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who
> shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do
> all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among
> ourselves and with all nations."
>
> http://www.radaronline.com/features/2008/03/obama_jeremiah_wright_ful...

Actually, he should have stuck with the first part of his speech,
which was beautifully written by someone of the save clerness of. Ms.
Kathy Noonan, who wrote Regan's speeches. Eveyone applaud the fire
half of the speech. Some secondary loser evidently wrote the second
half of the speech, and to most people it fell flat on its face.  It
fell flat on its face because too much time was wasted on fictious 9-
year old kid who make the reamkable sacrafice of eating "mustard and
relish" sandwitches to save the mother money.

Now many people will not realize what the terrible slip this was, but
it really hit home with most us who were working our way though our
first college degree in the early 1960.  What Mr. Obama does not seem
to realize, was the daily meal for us.Us guys in Phliadelphiia, where
he made his desperate speech were sitting at Littons resturant, and
putting mouns of pickles, reliish and mustard on the thin sliced
hamburger that were seved to us, simply to get us, barely enough
nutrician to get through another day day of study at Drexel, let alone
Priceton  and Harvard.
I seriously doubt that Mr. Obama has ever gone though this exerience,
and evidenly is a child of wealth, so how dare he even raise this
issue!

I perasonallly belive that even beyone his rather bizarre religion,
Mr. Obama is hiding quite a bit more fact. Things like, where did all
this mony suddely emerge? How did he suddendly emerge in life as a US
Senator, rather than a state repl  Things voters want and need to
know, and quite honest seem rather mysterious.

Harry C.