🚀 go-pugleaf

On 18 May, 17:12, RustyJames <extremesoundandli...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 18, 9:36 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> > Jack Sprat wrote:
> > > j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> > >> In sci.physics Jack Sprat <jack_sp...@invalid.uk> wrote:
>
> > >>> Do you understand, at every level, how a transistor works? What
> > >>> is this "hole" theory then? A form of transmission using
> > >>> nothingness? Why would two materials conduct electricity in one
> > >>> direction, but not the other, based on how they are joined?
>
> > >>> Sounds pretty magical, no?
>
> > >> Not hardly; all those semiconductor physics classes made perfect
> > >> sense and things worked like the theory said in the lab.
>
> > > Where? In trade school? Yes! Just as I thought.
>
> > Jack is mistaking his ignorance and lack of education for others.
> > Those of us who have studied physics understand this but Jack is
> > enjoying his ignorance while hoping others have the same lack.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> EM radiation in a vacuum always travels at the speed of light,
> relative to the observer, regardless of the observer's velocity. It is
> been said by people smarter than me that Electromagnetic radiation
> does not require a material medium and can travel through a vacuum.
> The theory of electromagnetic radiation was developed by James Clerk
> Maxwell and published in 1865. He showed that the speed of propagation
> of electromagnetic radiation should be identical with that of light,
> about 186,000 mi (300,000 km) per sec. Subsequent experiments by
> Heinrich Hertz verified Maxwell's prediction through the discovery of
> radio waves, also known as hertzian waves. now back to your either
> statement, either is a medium it has resistant properties and
> dielectric properties as well one day I will show that directing a
> concentrated electromagnetic beam focused in a straight line down the
> waste beam of a intensely focused beam of light will oscillate an
> electric field generating an oscillating magnetic field, the magnetic
> field in turn generates an oscillating electric field, and so on.
> These oscillating fields together form an electromagnetic wave that
> will pull the dielectric sub straight out of the aether along the path
> of the light beam allowing a secondary path for EMR or light waves to
> propagate faster than C within the waste beam with the lower dialectic
> or resistance value of 330 ohms, even reducing this resistance
> slightly will increase the velocity of both EMR and light's
> propagation within the waste beam path.

Meaningless! Sorry, mate! What might make a kind of sense is a short
hyperdimesnsional path twixt two entities, one of which might be prior
to the other, though tiny in delay, unmeasurable by us, at the moment,
anyway. Remember 'Flatland', dynamicise it for, say, 5D+T, compress
the model a bit, add weightless information, and now you can have any
*speed* you like! In some, admittedly lowly probable universes, you
have probably got back before you left, yet the same old you! Anything
that can cancel out gravity can be anywhere it wants instantly, even
in *the past*, whatever that is! Future? Sure! We make bifurcated
decisions, so why not!

Seems obvious to me!
--
UncleEnglish.