🚀 go-pugleaf

zookumar yelubandi wrote:

> doug wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>>Jack Sprat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>RustyJames wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On May 18, 9:36 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Jack Sprat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Jack Sprat <jack_sp...@invalid.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Do you understand, at every level, how a transistor works? What
>>>>>>>>is this "hole" theory then? A form of transmission using
>>>>>>>>nothingness? Why would two materials conduct electricity in one
>>>>>>>>direction, but not the other, based on how they are joined?
>>>>>>>>Sounds pretty magical, no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Not hardly; all those semiconductor physics classes made perfect
>>>>>>>sense and things worked like the theory said in the lab.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where? In trade school? Yes! Just as I thought.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jack is mistaking his ignorance and lack of education for others.
>>>>>Those of us who have studied physics understand this but Jack is
>>>>>enjoying his ignorance while hoping others have the same lack.- Hide 
>>>>>quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>EM radiation in a vacuum always travels at the speed of light,
>>>>relative to the observer, regardless of the observer's velocity. 
>>>
>>>Do you think "doug" can actually get this far with his
>>>trade school understanding of physics?
>>
>>Since jack has nothing to contribute, he decides to make a silly
>>statement based on his ignorance of science as well as my
>>education. Unlike jack, I have a PhD in physics.
> 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>         Then you should have no problem refuting the official government
> version of events on 9/11/2001.  Go ahead ... use your esteemed standing
> as a physicist and explain to the people why the conservation laws of
> momentum prohibit the government's narrative of events; that physics
> alone can be used to establish the 'inside job' nature of the attacks.

Your paranoia is not a scientific argument, or any argument at all.
It is funny to see the cranks leap on this instead of actually trying
to learn some science. It is a lot easier to believe in conspiracies
than to study.
> 
>         Careful how you answer.  Your personal integrity and the
> integrity of your Phd certification ... are both at stake.
> 
>         -zookumar-
> 
> ps:     www.infowars.com
> 
> 
>