Article View: sci.physics
Article #9024Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ?
From: doug
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:32
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:32
68 lines
4511 bytes
4511 bytes
zookumar yelubandi wrote: > doug wrote: > >>zookumar yelubandi wrote: >> >>>>doug wrote: > > [...] > > >>>>Since jack has nothing to contribute, he decides to make a silly >>>>statement based on his ignorance of science as well as my >>>>education. Unlike jack, I have a PhD in physics. >>> >>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> >>> Then you should have no problem refuting the official government >>>version of events on 9/11/2001. Go ahead ... use your esteemed standing >>>as a physicist and explain to the people why the conservation laws of >>>momentum prohibit the government's narrative of events; that physics >>>alone can be used to establish the 'inside job' nature of the attacks. >> >>Your paranoia is not a scientific argument, or any argument at all. >>It is funny to see the cranks leap on this instead of actually trying >>to learn some science. It is a lot easier to believe in conspiracies >>than to study. > > > > There you have it, folks, positive proof that they hand out > doctorates to anybody who toes the establishment line. This clown, > 'doug', demands study of general physics, but won't engage in a study of > the physics of 9/11/2001 ... a study that scuttles the establishment > narrative of the attack events. No, the paranoia of the cranks does not constitue science. The advantage the cranks have is that they are not constrained to the facts. They enjoy imaginary conspiracies. Instead of developing the physics, he > prefers not addressing it all. It's not like I was asking him to > discuss Schroedinger's Kitty, or Minkowski's diagram, or Young's > modulus, or Chandrasekhar's limit, or perturbation theory. Law of > conservation of linear momentum ... c'mon, how difficult is that? > > Lacking integrity, then, how much value is there in any argument > 'doug' makes ... on any subject at all, much less physics? Science does not contain your paranoia. > > The next physics charlatan waving a piece of papyrus ... please > step forth and identify yourself. Yes, you may take five minutes to put > on some adult diapers. Enjoy reveling in your stupidity. > > > -zookumar- > > ps: www.infowars.com > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<68SdnZiu26Obq4_XnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.docknet>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.docknet!news.posted.docknet.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET> <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET> <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 41be78289e,213549de22373342 X-Google-Attributes: gid41be78289e,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.docknet!news.posted.docknet.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:31:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:32:06 -0800 From: doug <xx@xx.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ? References: <68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET> <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET> <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82> In-Reply-To: <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <68SdnZiu26Obq4_XnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.docknet> Lines: 68 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.136.147.28 X-Trace: sv3-L3IO9YJtNpK+abWSmDwiBnz8UlWNK+llssB9tN+ADuMATtDHt1/zztXKo1Q1aaxPj+KRydu7HeYcQAA!sB3WQUwdxZZrs54KY+lfO9pqrTGMEenPXpZgdo3AIIgCJIJLhqPLqDyoGAczkZvUQjFqeo2OQlGy!zBxPkbOeNVo= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.39 X-Original-Bytes: 4257