🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #9024

Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ?

#9024
From: doug
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:32
68 lines
4511 bytes

zookumar yelubandi wrote:

> doug wrote:
> 
>>zookumar yelubandi wrote:
>>
>>>>doug wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
>>>>Since jack has nothing to contribute, he decides to make a silly
>>>>statement based on his ignorance of science as well as my
>>>>education. Unlike jack, I have a PhD in physics.
>>>
>>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>>        Then you should have no problem refuting the official government
>>>version of events on 9/11/2001.  Go ahead ... use your esteemed standing
>>>as a physicist and explain to the people why the conservation laws of
>>>momentum prohibit the government's narrative of events; that physics
>>>alone can be used to establish the 'inside job' nature of the attacks.
>>
>>Your paranoia is not a scientific argument, or any argument at all.
>>It is funny to see the cranks leap on this instead of actually trying
>>to learn some science. It is a lot easier to believe in conspiracies
>>than to study.
> 
> 
> 
>         There you have it, folks, positive proof that they hand out
> doctorates to anybody who toes the establishment line.   This clown,
> 'doug', demands study of general physics, but won't engage in a study of
> the physics of 9/11/2001 ... a study that scuttles the establishment
> narrative of the attack events.  

No, the paranoia of the cranks does not constitue science. The
advantage the cranks have is that they are not constrained to
the facts. They enjoy  imaginary conspiracies.


Instead of developing the physics, he
> prefers not addressing it all.  It's not like I was asking him to
> discuss Schroedinger's Kitty, or Minkowski's diagram, or Young's
> modulus, or Chandrasekhar's limit, or perturbation theory.   Law of
> conservation of linear momentum ... c'mon, how difficult is that?
> 
>         Lacking integrity, then, how much value is there in any argument
> 'doug' makes ... on any subject at all, much less physics?

Science does not contain your paranoia.

>         
>         The next physics charlatan waving a piece of papyrus ... please
> step forth and identify yourself.  Yes, you may take five minutes to put
> on some adult diapers.

Enjoy reveling in your stupidity.

> 
> 
>         -zookumar-
> 
> ps:     www.infowars.com 
> 
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <68SdnZiu26Obq4_XnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.docknet>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.docknet!news.posted.docknet.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET> <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET> <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 41be78289e,213549de22373342
X-Google-Attributes: gid41be78289e,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.docknet!news.posted.docknet.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:31:02 -0500
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:32:06 -0800
From: doug <xx@xx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ?
References: <68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>  <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>  <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>  <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET>  <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET>  <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>
In-Reply-To: <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <68SdnZiu26Obq4_XnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.docknet>
Lines: 68
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.136.147.28
X-Trace: sv3-L3IO9YJtNpK+abWSmDwiBnz8UlWNK+llssB9tN+ADuMATtDHt1/zztXKo1Q1aaxPj+KRydu7HeYcQAA!sB3WQUwdxZZrs54KY+lfO9pqrTGMEenPXpZgdo3AIIgCJIJLhqPLqDyoGAczkZvUQjFqeo2OQlGy!zBxPkbOeNVo=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
X-Original-Bytes: 4257