🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #9029

Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ?

#9029
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:13
56 lines
4249 bytes
On May 18, 7:02 pm, zookumar yelubandi <zooku...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> doug wrote:
> > zookumar yelubandi wrote:
> > > > doug wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> > >>Since jack has nothing to contribute, he decides to make a silly
> > >>statement based on his ignorance of science as well as my
> > >>education. Unlike jack, I have a PhD in physics.
>
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > >         Then you should have no problem refuting the official government
> > > version of events on 9/11/2001.  Go ahead ... use your esteemed standing
> > > as a physicist and explain to the people why the conservation laws of
> > > momentum prohibit the government's narrative of events; that physics
> > > alone can be used to establish the 'inside job' nature of the attacks.
>
> > Your paranoia is not a scientific argument, or any argument at all.
> > It is funny to see the cranks leap on this instead of actually trying
> > to learn some science. It is a lot easier to believe in conspiracies
> > than to study.
>
>         There you have it, folks, positive proof that they hand out
> doctorates to anybody who toes the establishment line.   This clown,
> 'doug', demands study of general physics, but won't engage in a study of
> the physics of 9/11/2001 ... a study that scuttles the establishment
> narrative of the attack events.  Instead of developing the physics, he
> prefers not addressing it all.  It's not like I was asking him to
> discuss Schroedinger's Kitty, or Minkowski's diagram, or Young's
> modulus, or Chandrasekhar's limit, or perturbation theory.   Law of
> conservation of linear momentum ... c'mon, how difficult is that?
>
>         Lacking integrity, then, how much value is there in any argument
> 'doug' makes ... on any subject at all, much less physics?
>
>         The next physics charlatan waving a piece of papyrus ... please
> step forth and identify yourself.  Yes, you may take five minutes to put
> on some adult diapers.
>
>         -zookumar-
>
> ps:    www.infowars.com

Where the fuck do these armchair structural engineers keep coming
from? Go away.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <c243e54d-00f5-4468-b129-12bf5b8d5c65@c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET> <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET> <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 41be78289e,213549de22373342
X-Google-Attributes: gid41be78289e,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ?
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <c243e54d-00f5-4468-b129-12bf5b8d5c65@c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> 
 <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
 <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET>
 <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET>
 <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
 <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet>
 <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet>
 <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.165.96.39
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242731630 18958 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2009 11:13:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:13:50 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=199.165.96.39; 
 posting-account=rIfu6QoAAAD5nXG3h9QEE0J3dZn1U45R
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) 
 Gecko/2009051019 Gentoo Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)