Article View: sci.physics
Article #9029Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ?
From: Eric Gisse
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:13
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:13
56 lines
4249 bytes
4249 bytes
On May 18, 7:02 pm, zookumar yelubandi <zooku...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > doug wrote: > > zookumar yelubandi wrote: > > > > doug wrote: > > [...] > > > > > >>Since jack has nothing to contribute, he decides to make a silly > > >>statement based on his ignorance of science as well as my > > >>education. Unlike jack, I have a PhD in physics. > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Then you should have no problem refuting the official government > > > version of events on 9/11/2001. Go ahead ... use your esteemed standing > > > as a physicist and explain to the people why the conservation laws of > > > momentum prohibit the government's narrative of events; that physics > > > alone can be used to establish the 'inside job' nature of the attacks. > > > Your paranoia is not a scientific argument, or any argument at all. > > It is funny to see the cranks leap on this instead of actually trying > > to learn some science. It is a lot easier to believe in conspiracies > > than to study. > > There you have it, folks, positive proof that they hand out > doctorates to anybody who toes the establishment line. This clown, > 'doug', demands study of general physics, but won't engage in a study of > the physics of 9/11/2001 ... a study that scuttles the establishment > narrative of the attack events. Instead of developing the physics, he > prefers not addressing it all. It's not like I was asking him to > discuss Schroedinger's Kitty, or Minkowski's diagram, or Young's > modulus, or Chandrasekhar's limit, or perturbation theory. Law of > conservation of linear momentum ... c'mon, how difficult is that? > > Lacking integrity, then, how much value is there in any argument > 'doug' makes ... on any subject at all, much less physics? > > The next physics charlatan waving a piece of papyrus ... please > step forth and identify yourself. Yes, you may take five minutes to put > on some adult diapers. > > -zookumar- > > ps: www.infowars.com Where the fuck do these armchair structural engineers keep coming from? Go away.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<c243e54d-00f5-4468-b129-12bf5b8d5c65@c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET> <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET> <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 41be78289e,213549de22373342 X-Google-Attributes: gid41be78289e,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.org.mensa,cam.misc,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: how to prove that sound is a wave ? Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 56 Message-ID: <c243e54d-00f5-4468-b129-12bf5b8d5c65@c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <68a90408-d3a5-4aea-8dcd-5fd45650959d@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <otl5e6-plq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6e9cc597-42c7-40b3-b0e4-1942aaac2e0b@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <v5q5e6-t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57f69143-27c2-4753-b26c-b2de09b8d070@e24g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <irt5e6-k02.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7e579$4a105374$483141c$25357@DIALUPUSA.NET> <mnl6e6-1ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d10ae$4a10e1e8$483170d$4332@DIALUPUSA.NET> <EIydnYFmafi_HYzXnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.docknet> <df1ac5f7-0189-432a-bc78-f4ff5d724cd7@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <f2c9c$4a11a45c$4831164$8420@DIALUPUSA.NET> <YZWdnTzJHts1MYzXnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@posted.docknet> <ginQl.28595$PH1.11955@edtnps82> <I8ydnW5sYZdpiY_XnZ2dnUVZ_jhi4p2d@posted.docknet> <cjpQl.28615$PH1.9270@edtnps82> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.165.96.39 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242731630 18958 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2009 11:13:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=199.165.96.39; posting-account=rIfu6QoAAAD5nXG3h9QEE0J3dZn1U45R User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009051019 Gentoo Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)