🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 8, 10:51 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 9:31 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 8, 12:26 am, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
>
> > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 5, 9:43 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <p...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
> > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > [snip]
>
> > > > > > Bullets have mass. How does a massless particle travel through a void?
>
> > > > > > It doesn't. It requires a medium and the medium is aether.
>
> > > > > What does having/not having mass have to do with traveling/not traveling
> > > > > through a void?
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Paul Hovnanian     mailto:P...@Hovnanian.com
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Deja fubar: The feeling that you've made the same mistake before.
>
> > > > To me, there are only two ways for something to have momentum:
>
> > > > 1. The object has mass and can have momentum and since it has mass it
> > > > can exist on its own and does not require a medium in order for it to
> > > > maintain its momentum.
> > > > 2. The object is a wave, or a burst, that travels through a medium.
>
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum#Momentum_in_electromagnetism
>
> > > > How can something without mass exist in a void (i.e. exist in
> > > > nothing), let alone travel through it?
>
> > > What is mass? You might think you know, in the classical physics sense.
> > > But until you can explain what it is, its your job to answer the
> > > question 'how can something have mass'. Void or no void.
>
> > > --
> > > Paul Hovnanian     mailto:P...@Hovnanian.com
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that.
>
> > Mass occupies three dimensional space.
>
> > No two masses can occupy the same point in three dimensional space
> > simultaneously.
>
> > That's not to say two objects with mass cannot occupy the same amount
> > of three dimensional space simultaneously because all objects, except
> > a black hole, contain aether.
>
> > And if two objects interact in such a way that they occupy the same
> > amount of three dimensional space then that means the objects are
> > twice as dense and displacing twice the aether.
>
> That's not to say two objects with mass cannot occupy the same AREA
> of three dimensional space simultaneously because all objects, except
> a black hole, contain aether.
>
> And if two objects interact in such a way that they occupy the same
> AREA of three dimensional space then that means the objects are
> twice as dense and displacing twice the aether.

Hope this is it for the re-posts on these two sentences:

That's not to say two objects with mass cannot occupy the same area of
three dimensional space simultaneously because all objects, except a
black hole, contain aether.

And if two objects interact in such a way that they occupy the same
area of three dimensional space then that means the area of three
dimensional space the objects occupy is twice as dense and displacing
twice the aether.