🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 3, 12:17 pm, UncleEnglish <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 Jan, 16:11, john291208 <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 9:05 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 3, 9:45 am, "mpc...@gmail.com" <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 3, 1:21 am, UncleEnglish <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 3 Jan, 01:11, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
> > > > > > "mpc...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > > > > > >Aetheris the lowest common denominator of matter.
> > > > > > [snip rest of crap]
> > > > > > idiot
> > > > > > "The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and
> > > > > > stupidity," Harlan Ellison.
>
> > > > > > "Ordinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely
> > > > > > stupid," Heinrich Heine.
>
> > > > > > "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and
> > > > > > I'm not sure about the former," Albert Einstein.
>
> > > > > > "Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
> > > > > > handicapped," Elbert Hubbard
>
> > > > > > "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain,"  Friedrich
> > > > > > von Schiller.
>
> > > > > > "There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity," Johann Wolfgang
> > > > > > von Goethe
>
> > > > > > "Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity,"
> > > > > > Stephen Vizinczey.
>
> > > > > > "Fools rush in where fools have been before," Unknown
>
> > > > > >http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
> > > > > > Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
> > > > > > <http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>
> > > > > >  Noaether
>
> > > > > >http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/http://physicsweb.org/arti...
> > > > > > <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-5/index.html>http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0287
> > > > > >  No Lorentz violation
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > > > > >  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> > > > > There has to be a medium that is stable and then may be modulated to
> > > > > send signals, if all we have is physiological/bodily/mass presences.
>
> > > > > Outside that, maybe there is something else. Minds may well weigh
> > > > > nothing. Indeed, they quite possibly do not exist beyond the life of
> > > > > anyone's body!
>
> > > > >http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9pXjnn3aL2A&feature=related
> > > > > --
> > > > > foolsrushin.
>
> > > > Not sure I'm ready to jump on the "morphic resonance" band wagon, but
> > > > ouraetherdisplacements are interacting.
>
> > > > Obviously, it's hard enough trying to "bring backaether" without
> > > > jumping to philosophical and physiological realms, even though
> > > > acceptingaetheris philosophical at its core.
>
> > > > Aetherdisplacementis a much better explanation for the behaviors in
> > > > the Double Slit Experiment than quantum mechanics probability.
>
> > > Aether displacement is a much better explanation for the behaviors in
> > > the Double Slit Experiment than quantum mechanics probability and
> > > duality.
>
> > Aether displacement doesn't happen.
> > 'Displacement'  is something two materials do to each other.
> > Aether is not material. When aether is transformed into
> > matter by the addition of energy, then that matter will
> > displace something. But it won't be aether, because that's
> > what the matter is made from, or better, how the matter
> > 'is expressed' (in the connotation of a word.)
> > The aether stays where it is- like a movie screen
> > while energy moves through it in whatever patterns or non-patterns..
> > Nothing displaces it or is displaced by it
> >  However no other energy structure can
> > use all or some of the same aether to appear as
> > matter at the same time.(Some time-share eg molecules.)
> > You get the difference? You're talking apples and oranges,
> > or, better, chicken and egg.
>
> > john.
>
> A perfectly reasonable response. You throw a stone into a pond,
> ripples spread out .... . But the aether is in a sort of way the pond.
> A 'flat' metaphor, I suppose, though it is how I learnt to think about
> energy in 3D+t. If there were at least one upper dimension, then you
> might possibly be able to play games with space and time - just as in
> Abbot's Flatland a ball passing through their world would start and
> end as a dot. Painters have cheated their way into 3D. 4D+t tetrahedal
> beings or entities and their environment would be unimagiable to us,
> if they exist, though they might be able to appear and disappear when
> and where they wished.
> --
> foolsrushin.


No, no, you cheat the other way!
You make the matter *appear* to be Two Dimensional.
By the right resonance in the material,
the 98% nothingness that is the atom all points the same way
at the same time in regular rythym.

Imagine a long pipe with perpetually spinning coins every few feet
that were slightly less than the diameter of the pipe. If these
coins spin randomly, as is the case overall in large bodies of
matter, you can't see through the pipe.
But if all the coins cycle through their spin and are
edge-on once per unit time, the viewer *can* see through
the pipe.
This is where you play games with space if not time.
Well, time if you count being able to move matter with
almost no resistance (sic *inertia*).

Fun games.

john
galaxy model