🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 13, 6:32�pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> rbwinn wrote:
> > On Sep 13, 6:02 pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >> rbwinn wrote:
> >>> On Sep 12, 3:45?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com> wrote:
> >>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>> On Sep 11, 7:41?am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> >>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sep 10, 12:43 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:09 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 1:09 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 4, 11:47 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rbwinn wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, the best one to take your accusation to would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus Christ..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Soon as he starts existing that is...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Starts existing? Jesus Christ has eternal life.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus is fiction.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, the best one to tell your idea would be Jesus Christ.
> >>>>>>>>>> Soon as he starts existing I get right on that.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Why
> >>>>>>>>>>> don't you take a few moments to tell him when he returns to
> >>>>>>>>>>> judge the earth.
> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, yeah, yeah. You people been threatening that for 2,000
> >>>>>>>>>> years. About time to admit you were wrong doncha think?
> >>>>>>>>> Well, not according to Matthew 24. If the wicked servant saith
> >>>>>>>>> in his heart, My Lord delayeth his coming and beginneth to
> >>>>>>>>> smite his fellow servants and to eat and drink with the
> >>>>>>>>> drunken, the Lord cometh in an hour he thinketh not, and he is
> >>>>>>>>> appointed his portion with the hypocrites.
> >>>>>>>> Well, that made no freaking sense at all...- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>>>> Not everyone wants to be with you people.
> >>>>>> So, you're posting in alt.atheism why?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>> The atheists started posting in sci.physics, and since they refuse
> >>>>> to take sci.physics.relativity out of the headers, they are still
> >>>>> seeing my posts. ?They have been told numerous times by people in
> >>>>> sci.physics that their posts are off topic in that newsgroup.
> >>>> How many times do we have to tell you that us taking sci.physics out
> >>>> of the header does not stop your posts coming to a.a.?
> >>>> If you take a.a. out of *your* headers, you won't get any replies
> >>>> from us.
> >>>> Smiler,
> >>>> The godless one
> >>>> a.a.# 2279- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> If you take sci.physics out of your headers, you will not get any
> >>> replies from me. You were the one complaining about getting replies.
> >>> I do not care whether you reply to me or not.
> >> Hmm. Lets see now. *Every* atheist would have to take sci.physics out of the
> >> header before I see no more posts from you.
> >> But just you, and you alone, can take alt.atheism out of *your* headers and
> >> no-one on a.a. will see your posts and will not reply to them in s.p.
> >> Or is that a too difficult concept for your tiny mind to accept, skippy?
>
> >> Smiler,
>
> > You were the atheist complaining about it. �Take sci.physiocs out of
> > the header.
>
> Take some freaking responsibility for your posts.
>
> --
> Mark K. Bilbo � �

OK.  I am going to be making some comments about mathematics and
physics here in sci.physics.  Any atheist who might be offended by
this should take sci.physics out of the header.
Robert B. Winn