🚀 go-pugleaf

 Hi !


   Some experimental possibilities of "Structure of Time":

   (I put this here because there have been so many unbusinesslike comments
    about my article)


 1.  Could there be a sign of existence of "space-potato" in a Fermilab's
   experiment described below by David Brahm's article
   <1992May20.001911.3915@cco.caltech.edu>, (Particle called "space-potato" was
   described in my article "Structure of Time"
   <1992Jul27.130251.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>). ?
 2.  Could burst of gamma-rays, coming uniformly from all directions of the
   sky (recently there was some articles about this in sci.astro), be a sing
   of disturbances in "radiation peripheries", which was described in the
   same article mentioned above. ?
 3.  Could quantized redshifts of distant galaxies (recently there was some
   articles about this in sci.astro) be a sign of existence of very heavy
   mass (about 10exp50 kg) in center of the space, this mass was also
   described in same article mentioned above. ?


         Hannu.


 Below this David Brahm's article:

>X-News: tnclus sci.physics:11506
>From: brahm@cco.caltech.edu (David E. Brahm)
>Subject:Re: Neutrino rumor
>Date: Wed, 20 May 1992 00:19:11 GMT
>Message-ID:<1992May20.001911.3915@cco.caltech.edu>
>
>Wow, my own personal thread!  OK, here's everything I know now:
>
>Someone analyzed old Fermilab neutrino-beam data, and saw a statistically
>significant dozen or so events in which 2 neutral-current interactions
>(i.e. no charged leptons) were separated by about 30 cm (1 ns).  Thus:
>
>      nu_mu                  X                 nu?
> -->----+-------+------------>------------+------>-----
>        Z        Z                         Z
>        Z         Z    q (to jets)          Z    q (to jets)
>        Z          Z--<                      Z--<
>     (target)          qbar (to jets)            qbar (to jets)
>
>Since the final neutrino is not actually seen, we only assume it's there to
>conserve fermion number.  Thus we assume X is undergoing a 3-body weak
>decay, with some small mixing angle, say theta=.01 .  Gamma ~ theta^2 m^5,
>so by comparison to muon decay (tau = 2000 ns, m = .1 GeV) we guess m_X =
>2.5 GeV or so.
>
>--
>Staccato signals of constant information,  |  -- David Brahm
>A loose affiliation of millionaires and    |  (brahm@coil.caltech.edu)
>  billionaires and Baby ...                |---------------------------
>These are the days of miracle and wonder,  | Disclaimer:  I only speak
>And don't cry, Baby, don't cry, don't cry. |   for the sensible folks.