🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug7.192009.29866@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov (Dr. Norman J. LaFave) writes:

>Furthermore, the cost per scientific discovery is always better with a flexible
>device like the Supercollider.

????  Documentation please.  A good place to start would be with
cost per discovery of other large accelerators.  A rough estimate of
cost per discovery for SSC would then be obtainable by ratioing the
cost of the tools (unless we can come up with a reason to believe
that SSC will make more or fewer discoveries than machines already
on line have done).  We could then compare this with cost per
discovery of advances made in other areas such as condensed matter
physics.