Article View: sci.physics
Article #297Re: Standard QM rules out FTL correlation signals, simplest proof.
From: Blair P. Houghton
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 01:22
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 01:22
14 lines
1022 bytes
1022 bytes
In article <1d1tk9INNsk8@network.ucsd.edu> mbk@lyapunov.ucsd.edu (Matt Kennel) writes: >svetlich@math.rutgers.edu (George Svetlichny) writes: >: Thus standard QM does not allow for correlation signals between commuting >: observables. Space-like separated observables commute, so there are no >: correlation signals between them *at all*, be they superluminal, luminal, >: or subluminal. > >How are conservation laws enforced? Spottily. --Blair "The owls are not what they seem." -A giant.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov2.012218.27459@ichips.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!sedona!bhoughtoReferences:
<Oct.29.14.32.32.1992.11090@math.rutgers.edu> <1d1tk9INNsk8@network.ucsd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!sedona!bhoughto From: bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) Subject: Re: Standard QM rules out FTL correlation signals, simplest proof. Message-ID: <1992Nov2.012218.27459@ichips.intel.com> Sender: news@ichips.intel.com (News Account) Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona References: <Oct.29.14.32.32.1992.11090@math.rutgers.edu> <1d1tk9INNsk8@network.ucsd.edu> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 01:22:18 GMT Lines: 14