🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

6 total messages Started by Alex W. Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:44
Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
#14037
Author: Alex W.
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:44
45 lines
2729 bytes
"The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:1215258133.31705.0@proxy02.news.clara.net...
> Alex W. wrote:
>> <hhyapster@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:f2d24248-09ba-41c1-b915-ac08addd328a@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jul 5, 12:35 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:2efb0043-fcce-424b-9881->
>>>>
>>>> Jesus Christ said that no person will enter heaven who has not been
>>>>
>>>>> cleansed of sin.  All atheists I have conversed with have told me they
>>>>> do not want to enter heaven.
>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>> God has never commanded me to do anything at any time.
>>>> I've never even met the guy.
>>>> Therefore, I have never disobeyed him.
>>>> As it is your belief that sin is when someone disobeys God, then I have
>>>> never sinned.
>>>> So does that mean I get to go to heaven?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve O
>>>> a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
>>>> B.A.A.W.A.
>>>> Convicted by Earthquack,
>>>> Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
>>>> "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at
>>>> the
>>>> face, you can see a burnt tortilla"
>>> No, the heaven is for the loons to suffer.
>>> We all can go to places where there are plenty of sexy angels.
>>
>> Uh .... no.
>> Angels are sexless.  No gender, no funny-shaped bits of biology.
>> Sorry.
> According to some authorities they are discarnate enities having some of
> the elements of personality and intelligence. translated into something
> approxiamting a human form by the observers worldview.
>
> So they could be sexy: the word for that is succubus.
>
Ah, but succubi and incubi are demons rather than angels (female and male
respectively).
Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
#14044
Author: The Natural Philosopher
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:33
53 lines
3186 bytes
Alex W. wrote:
> "The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
> news:1215258133.31705.0@proxy02.news.clara.net...
>> Alex W. wrote:
>>> <hhyapster@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f2d24248-09ba-41c1-b915-ac08addd328a@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Jul 5, 12:35 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:2efb0043-fcce-424b-9881->
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus Christ said that no person will enter heaven who has not been
>>>>>
>>>>>> cleansed of sin.  All atheists I have conversed with have told me they
>>>>>> do not want to enter heaven.
>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>> God has never commanded me to do anything at any time.
>>>>> I've never even met the guy.
>>>>> Therefore, I have never disobeyed him.
>>>>> As it is your belief that sin is when someone disobeys God, then I have
>>>>> never sinned.
>>>>> So does that mean I get to go to heaven?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve O
>>>>> a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
>>>>> B.A.A.W.A.
>>>>> Convicted by Earthquack,
>>>>> Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
>>>>> "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at
>>>>> the
>>>>> face, you can see a burnt tortilla"
>>>> No, the heaven is for the loons to suffer.
>>>> We all can go to places where there are plenty of sexy angels.
>>> Uh .... no.
>>> Angels are sexless.  No gender, no funny-shaped bits of biology.
>>> Sorry.
>> According to some authorities they are discarnate enities having some of
>> the elements of personality and intelligence. translated into something
>> approxiamting a human form by the observers worldview.
>>
>> So they could be sexy: the word for that is succubus.
>>
> Ah, but succubi and incubi are demons rather than angels (female and male
> respectively).
> 
> 

No, that is a later redefinition by the masturbating priests.


> 
> 
> 
Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
#14046
Author: BURT
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:10
3 lines
1528 bytes
There was a Beginning to time but No Before.

Mitch Raemsch
Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
#13983
Author: BuddyThunder
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:50
8 lines
2100 bytes
BURT wrote:
> There was a Beginning to time but No Before.
> 
> Mitch Raemsch

There
-----------------------------
Ho! <whack>
Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
#13984
Author: BuddyThunder
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:50
54 lines
3941 bytes
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> Alex W. wrote:
>> "The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>> news:1215258133.31705.0@proxy02.news.clara.net...
>>> Alex W. wrote:
>>>> <hhyapster@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:f2d24248-09ba-41c1-b915-ac08addd328a@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... 
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 5, 12:35 am, "Steve O" <nospamh...@thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "rbwinn" <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:2efb0043-fcce-424b-9881->
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jesus Christ said that no person will enter heaven who has not been
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cleansed of sin.  All atheists I have conversed with have told me 
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> do not want to enter heaven.
>>>>>>> Robert B. Winn
>>>>>> God has never commanded me to do anything at any time.
>>>>>> I've never even met the guy.
>>>>>> Therefore, I have never disobeyed him.
>>>>>> As it is your belief that sin is when someone disobeys God, then I 
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> never sinned.
>>>>>> So does that mean I get to go to heaven?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Steve O
>>>>>> a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
>>>>>> B.A.A.W.A.
>>>>>> Convicted by Earthquack,
>>>>>> Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence
>>>>>> "I have a miraculous picture of Jesus - if you look really closely at
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> face, you can see a burnt tortilla"
>>>>> No, the heaven is for the loons to suffer.
>>>>> We all can go to places where there are plenty of sexy angels.
>>>> Uh .... no.
>>>> Angels are sexless.  No gender, no funny-shaped bits of biology.
>>>> Sorry.
>>> According to some authorities they are discarnate enities having some of
>>> the elements of personality and intelligence. translated into something
>>> approxiamting a human form by the observers worldview.
>>>
>>> So they could be sexy: the word for that is succubus.
>>>
>> Ah, but succubi and incubi are demons rather than angels (female and male
>> respectively).
>>
>>
> 
> No, that is a later redefinition by the masturbating priests.

Thanks for the imagery! Half-eaten cornflakes, anyone?
Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
#14000
Author: Smiler
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:04
12 lines
1807 bytes
"BURT" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:6b6f1f0f-3288-476d-a5c4-1fe7bd9adff0@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> There was a Beginning to time but No Before.
>
> Mitch Raemsch
=======================
Ho! <whack>

Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279 
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads