🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Oct25.131109.28884@athena.mit.edu> bjohnson@athena.mit.edu (Brett W Johnson) writes:
)In article <1990Oct24.233638.1774@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> wp6@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Walter Pohl) writes:
)>In article <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> reiser@pmafire.UUCP (Steve Reiser) writes:
)>>begun to wonder what man's true nature really is. I have nothing against
)>		       ^^^
)>
)>	When I read this article, at first I was confused as to whether you
)>meant "male" or "person".  All possible ambiguity would be removed if you 
)>used "person" in place of "man".
)
)"Man" is used correctly here.  "Person" would NOT have been correct.

"begun to wonder what person's true nature really is" - is defintiely
not correct.

"begun to wonder what people's nature really is" seems a little off - 
"begun to wonder what people's nature really are" seems worse

"begun to wonder what human nature really is" is a little better, IMO.

The difference between people's nature and human nature isn't very great -
I think it boils down to a matter of personal preference here.