Article View: sci.research
Article #598Re: animal research
From: Timothy Fay
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1989 19:25
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1989 19:25
17 lines
1237 bytes
1237 bytes
skellyjp@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (James P Skelly) writes:
>In article <221@anselm.UUCP>, sperry@anselm.UUCP (MALF) writes:
>> Using animals for scientific research is completely unnecessary and
>> cruel to the animals. With todays technology we do not need to use
>> animals for the research. The tests done have been done at least 100
>> times allready.
>
>This is wrong. There is no substitute for the use of animals in medical
>research nor is animal research cruel to the animals...
I can accept that, under certain conditions, some animal research MAY be
necessary. But please spare us this baloney that animal research isn't
cruel to the animals. It IS cruel and, someday hopefully, it will also
be unnecessary.
UUCP: {uunet!rosevax, amdahl!bungia, chinet, killer}!orbit!pnet51!avatar
INET: avatar@pnet51.cts.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<593@orbit.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!nic.MR.NET!umn-cs!bungia!orbit!pnet51!avatarShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!nic.MR.NET!umn-cs!bungia!orbit!pnet51!avatar From: avatar@pnet51.cts.com (Timothy Fay) Newsgroups: sci.research,talk.politics.misc,sci.bio Subject: Re: animal research Message-ID: <593@orbit.UUCP> Date: 1 Feb 89 19:25:26 GMT Sender: root@orbit.UUCP Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN. Lines: 17