Article View: sci.research
Article #657Re: Success with cold fusion reported
From: David Watson
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1989 11:14
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1989 11:14
19 lines
1568 bytes
1568 bytes
In article <1008@blic.BLI.COM> miket@blic.BLI.COM (Mike Tossy) writes: [...] depending upon the technology, it maybe cheaper to build less capacity and use the existing powergrid to load balance than it would be to build enough capacity for each site to meet its peak demand. (My house uses little energy during the day and my office uses little power at night. Today with centralized power production we can share the installed power plant capacity - not so without a power grid.) This implies something that deserves explicit mention: there is nothing I know of that makes a "grid" incompatible with decentralizing energy production. In at least some places, individuals with windmills sell their surplus power back to a utility. If each household made enough power on the average, couldn't we still use the "grid" just to balance the load? What if utilities stopped producing and became brokers? -D.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<WATSON.89Mar31111458@shinobu.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sgi!shinobu!shinobu.sgi.com!watsonReferences:
<18213@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <3451@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu> <2183@cpoint.UUCP> <1008@blic.BLI.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sgi!shinobu!shinobu.sgi.com!watson From: watson@shinobu.sgi.com (David Watson) Newsgroups: sci.research,sci.space,sci.environment,misc.headlines,sci.misc Subject: Re: Success with cold fusion reported Message-ID: <WATSON.89Mar31111458@shinobu.sgi.com> Date: 31 Mar 89 11:14:58 GMT References: <18213@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <3451@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu> <2183@cpoint.UUCP> <1008@blic.BLI.COM> Sender: news@shinobu.SGI.COM Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mtn. View, CA Lines: 19 In-reply-to: miket@blic.BLI.COM's message of 30 Mar 89 18:40:34 GMT